I don't identify with them, I'm not "oppressed" in my own life, and I hope people who advocate war and the genocide of children are well-meaning human beings who don't mean to traumatize generations of minorities who have access to the internet.
I'm sorry if I made this an age issue, but it really isn't.
Ok now you've used an example that is extreme which you hadn't mentioned in your original post. You did not specify advocates of genocide on children..
All the ists and phobes you mentioned get thrown around alot so they've lost some of their meaning. You say homophobe and people don't automatically think of some gay basher like decades ago. They think of someone who disapproves of one aspect or another of lgbtq. Which would include alot of People.
Same thing when you say racist. The word doesn't imply serious hatred or violence anymore. When I hear someone called racist I'm thinking they said the wrong thing in some context. Because that's all I ever see. I've never seen or heard of any racial violence where I live in my lifetime. So when I think of someone who has an unpopular opinion or a different opinion than me, I don't automatically assume they are a monster.
You're really on point with this, dude. Op is trying to do what's known as "moving the goalposts".
No one here wants to direct calls to genocide children. Op knows it and we know it. He's just throwing in there to buttress a point from the dying age of sjwism.
Good luck with that. Just because IIN is a right wing circle jerk doesn't mean "SJWism" is going anywhere. Whether any of you like it or not less than 100 years from now half of the opinions shared here are going to be viewed in the same light as the views of people who weren't so sure about women voting or blacks using the same water fountain. It's incredibly easy to see who is on the right side of history.
In the long game, progressives always win because things, well, progress. That's the arrow of time. That's progression. It's right there in the name. Progressives are just ready to be on with it. Blacks are free. Women vote. Blacks vote. Gays can marry. Now things are getting easier for trans people. You can't stop it. This is the trajectory.
As cringe as some might find SJWs, I find it more cringe something as noble sounding as "social justice warrior" has seen an attempt to have it painted as a bad thing. You bet your ass I fight for social justice. Social justice is obviously a good thing. Justice is a good thing.
Everyone here is a dumbfuck?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I don't identify with them, I'm not "oppressed" in my own life, and I hope people who advocate war and the genocide of children are well-meaning human beings who don't mean to traumatize generations of minorities who have access to the internet.
I'm sorry if I made this an age issue, but it really isn't.
--
Pilum
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Ok now you've used an example that is extreme which you hadn't mentioned in your original post. You did not specify advocates of genocide on children..
All the ists and phobes you mentioned get thrown around alot so they've lost some of their meaning. You say homophobe and people don't automatically think of some gay basher like decades ago. They think of someone who disapproves of one aspect or another of lgbtq. Which would include alot of People.
Same thing when you say racist. The word doesn't imply serious hatred or violence anymore. When I hear someone called racist I'm thinking they said the wrong thing in some context. Because that's all I ever see. I've never seen or heard of any racial violence where I live in my lifetime. So when I think of someone who has an unpopular opinion or a different opinion than me, I don't automatically assume they are a monster.
Genocide on children? OK that's different.
--
bigbudchonger
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
You're really on point with this, dude. Op is trying to do what's known as "moving the goalposts".
No one here wants to direct calls to genocide children. Op knows it and we know it. He's just throwing in there to buttress a point from the dying age of sjwism.
--
S0UNDS_WEIRD
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Good luck with that. Just because IIN is a right wing circle jerk doesn't mean "SJWism" is going anywhere. Whether any of you like it or not less than 100 years from now half of the opinions shared here are going to be viewed in the same light as the views of people who weren't so sure about women voting or blacks using the same water fountain. It's incredibly easy to see who is on the right side of history.
In the long game, progressives always win because things, well, progress. That's the arrow of time. That's progression. It's right there in the name. Progressives are just ready to be on with it. Blacks are free. Women vote. Blacks vote. Gays can marry. Now things are getting easier for trans people. You can't stop it. This is the trajectory.
As cringe as some might find SJWs, I find it more cringe something as noble sounding as "social justice warrior" has seen an attempt to have it painted as a bad thing. You bet your ass I fight for social justice. Social justice is obviously a good thing. Justice is a good thing.
--
bigbudchonger
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Lmao ye dude, people who don't agree with you? Must be a right wing circle jerk!
--
S0UNDS_WEIRD
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Back to the circle.
--
bigbudchonger
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Wagggh people disagree with me! Circle jerk, circle jerk!