I agree that it can be overused. I'm not referring to such instances; in fact, I despise such instances because shaming someone for not getting with a trans person is in itself against the personal preferences that LGBTQ+ vouch for. I'm referring to areas where people are deliberately attacking a group for no reason other than difference. There is nothing wrong with intellectual criticism of a certain culture, religion or race, but there's everything wrong with pointlessly attacking minorities.
Again, there's nothing really wrong with words, but hateful words towards certain groups breeds real-life violence, deaths and complications. Shouldn't we know this by now?
Are you saying it's okay to pointlessly attack the majority?
"hateful words towards certain groups breeds real-life violence, deaths and complications. Shouldn't we know this by now? "...Your original post can be interpreted as being, well, kinda hateful.
"I'm referring to areas where people are deliberately attacking a group for no reason other than difference."...That's interesting considering "Weirdos" made your list.
Yeah but it's one thing to have a bad opinion it's another to actually act on it. I stand with the side that promotes everyone getting to say what they want. As it opens the discussion for changing them. Shunning them will just create a bubble for them to congregate and share even worse ideas or even worse act on them.
Censorship is just sweeping a problem under the rug.
Everyone here is a dumbfuck?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I agree that it can be overused. I'm not referring to such instances; in fact, I despise such instances because shaming someone for not getting with a trans person is in itself against the personal preferences that LGBTQ+ vouch for. I'm referring to areas where people are deliberately attacking a group for no reason other than difference. There is nothing wrong with intellectual criticism of a certain culture, religion or race, but there's everything wrong with pointlessly attacking minorities.
Again, there's nothing really wrong with words, but hateful words towards certain groups breeds real-life violence, deaths and complications. Shouldn't we know this by now?
--
MonteMetcalfe
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
-
LloydAsher
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Are you saying it's okay to pointlessly attack the majority?
"hateful words towards certain groups breeds real-life violence, deaths and complications. Shouldn't we know this by now? "...Your original post can be interpreted as being, well, kinda hateful.
"I'm referring to areas where people are deliberately attacking a group for no reason other than difference."...That's interesting considering "Weirdos" made your list.
Yeah but it's one thing to have a bad opinion it's another to actually act on it. I stand with the side that promotes everyone getting to say what they want. As it opens the discussion for changing them. Shunning them will just create a bubble for them to congregate and share even worse ideas or even worse act on them.
Censorship is just sweeping a problem under the rug.