I agree that it can be overused. I'm not referring to such instances; in fact, I despise such instances because shaming someone for not getting with a trans person is in itself against the personal preferences that LGBTQ+ vouch for. I'm referring to areas where people are deliberately attacking a group for no reason other than difference. There is nothing wrong with intellectual criticism of a certain culture, religion or race, but there's everything wrong with pointlessly attacking minorities.
Again, there's nothing really wrong with words, but hateful words towards certain groups breeds real-life violence, deaths and complications. Shouldn't we know this by now?
Are you saying it's okay to pointlessly attack the majority?
"hateful words towards certain groups breeds real-life violence, deaths and complications. Shouldn't we know this by now? "...Your original post can be interpreted as being, well, kinda hateful.
"I'm referring to areas where people are deliberately attacking a group for no reason other than difference."...That's interesting considering "Weirdos" made your list.
Yeah but it's one thing to have a bad opinion it's another to actually act on it. I stand with the side that promotes everyone getting to say what they want. As it opens the discussion for changing them. Shunning them will just create a bubble for them to congregate and share even worse ideas or even worse act on them.
Censorship is just sweeping a problem under the rug.
I don't think not wanting to have sex with a trans person makes anyone transphobic, never ever. No one should ever have to explain to anyone why they aren't attracted to them, and or don't wanna have sex with them.
I've heard this before though, explained by a frustrated friend of lgbtq that it isn't phobic to not be attracted to someone. So it does need to be explained unfortunately.
Yes, it's totally fine to be not attracted to anyone for any reason, and honestly don't think any explanation is ever needed. I really can't stand the way some people can't handle rejection!
You're right. It's crazy the way things are and they're getting worse everyday and fast.
You dare not say anything about certain groups(I'm doing it myself now by not naming names🤨) without someone( very often some asshole who isn't even from the group, sjw dick....) jumping on you saying blah blah blah. It's all getting shitty very fast.
I'm glad i got out off western culture before it started going mad.
Everyone here is a dumbfuck?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Its overused. Example: People being transphobic because they wouldnt want to sleep with them.
--
Anonymous Post Author
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
RoseIsabella
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
I agree that it can be overused. I'm not referring to such instances; in fact, I despise such instances because shaming someone for not getting with a trans person is in itself against the personal preferences that LGBTQ+ vouch for. I'm referring to areas where people are deliberately attacking a group for no reason other than difference. There is nothing wrong with intellectual criticism of a certain culture, religion or race, but there's everything wrong with pointlessly attacking minorities.
Again, there's nothing really wrong with words, but hateful words towards certain groups breeds real-life violence, deaths and complications. Shouldn't we know this by now?
--
MonteMetcalfe
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
-
LloydAsher
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Are you saying it's okay to pointlessly attack the majority?
"hateful words towards certain groups breeds real-life violence, deaths and complications. Shouldn't we know this by now? "...Your original post can be interpreted as being, well, kinda hateful.
"I'm referring to areas where people are deliberately attacking a group for no reason other than difference."...That's interesting considering "Weirdos" made your list.
Yeah but it's one thing to have a bad opinion it's another to actually act on it. I stand with the side that promotes everyone getting to say what they want. As it opens the discussion for changing them. Shunning them will just create a bubble for them to congregate and share even worse ideas or even worse act on them.
Censorship is just sweeping a problem under the rug.
I don't think not wanting to have sex with a trans person makes anyone transphobic, never ever. No one should ever have to explain to anyone why they aren't attracted to them, and or don't wanna have sex with them.
--
Pilum
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I've heard this before though, explained by a frustrated friend of lgbtq that it isn't phobic to not be attracted to someone. So it does need to be explained unfortunately.
--
RoseIsabella
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
4
4
Yes, it's totally fine to be not attracted to anyone for any reason, and honestly don't think any explanation is ever needed. I really can't stand the way some people can't handle rejection!
--
12345678912
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You're right. It's crazy the way things are and they're getting worse everyday and fast.
You dare not say anything about certain groups(I'm doing it myself now by not naming names🤨) without someone( very often some asshole who isn't even from the group, sjw dick....) jumping on you saying blah blah blah. It's all getting shitty very fast.
I'm glad i got out off western culture before it started going mad.
--
RoseIsabella
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I'm not a fan SJWs.