Men are open to other men on their feelins and emotions and assuming they aren't because they don't do it to females is just causing more issues.
I dont support when feminism uses women in other countries to justify their points. Most western feminists do little to nothing about these women, they barely even speak about them unless they are using them to say "see, this is why we need feminism" and then forget all about them. Ok, let's just say women have these issues in other countries more than men have issues in the same places...Why does that have relevance in western civilization? Why aren't feminists primarily focusing on their issues? Because men definitely have more issues here and in western civilization, so even if women do have more issues in these other places that does not justify feminism primarily focusing on women in western civilization's issues over men's issues. Using the women's suffering in these other places just to maintain the group in a place those issues don't take part in so you can focus on small issues in the place feminists are tryin to maintain is using the suffering of others for their own purposes. It's wrong.
Yes, fatherlessness is a male issue, however the route of that problem is family court systems and how they happen behind closed doors. She doesn't mention that, but then again she might of been implying that, and if so, sure, I'll give her that one but one out of everything else doesn't make her accurate.
"How is saying men are imprisoned by gender roles not helping men".
Because they're just words. This is not something new, this has been stated by feminists for years, they still focus on female issues socially over male ones and barely, if ever, focus on male gender roles unless the purpose is on how it harms women. I am not going to sit through hearing feminists for years saying the same thing to justify their group being about equality, to try include men, then do nothing in regards to men then all of a sudden think "Oh, this feminist might actually do something because she's a celebrity even though others have said the exact same and done nothing for males in this aspect".
It's been said too much and nothing has been done about it. Until they "show" me they are doing something to help male issues, I am not going to believe their words.
As for your second last paragraph, again, that would be understandable if it wasn't backwards. Studies have found women more likely to be controlling than men, yet they just assume men are more controlling, which is them restricting men to a gender role by assumption, and so they are saying the opposite of what is true to paint women as victims, otherwise why else would they lie about it?
You're too easily convinced by feminism's pretty words. I am looking at this objectively, yes they say words that can sometimes be seen as wanting equality but stating things that aren't correct and doing nothing to help men even when saying they will isn't seeking equality, it's using the concept of equality to further your own agenda. Even God said he loves all of his children, and yet there is hell.
Emma Watson on Feminism; What are your thoughts?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Men are open to other men on their feelins and emotions and assuming they aren't because they don't do it to females is just causing more issues.
I dont support when feminism uses women in other countries to justify their points. Most western feminists do little to nothing about these women, they barely even speak about them unless they are using them to say "see, this is why we need feminism" and then forget all about them. Ok, let's just say women have these issues in other countries more than men have issues in the same places...Why does that have relevance in western civilization? Why aren't feminists primarily focusing on their issues? Because men definitely have more issues here and in western civilization, so even if women do have more issues in these other places that does not justify feminism primarily focusing on women in western civilization's issues over men's issues. Using the women's suffering in these other places just to maintain the group in a place those issues don't take part in so you can focus on small issues in the place feminists are tryin to maintain is using the suffering of others for their own purposes. It's wrong.
Yes, fatherlessness is a male issue, however the route of that problem is family court systems and how they happen behind closed doors. She doesn't mention that, but then again she might of been implying that, and if so, sure, I'll give her that one but one out of everything else doesn't make her accurate.
"How is saying men are imprisoned by gender roles not helping men".
Because they're just words. This is not something new, this has been stated by feminists for years, they still focus on female issues socially over male ones and barely, if ever, focus on male gender roles unless the purpose is on how it harms women. I am not going to sit through hearing feminists for years saying the same thing to justify their group being about equality, to try include men, then do nothing in regards to men then all of a sudden think "Oh, this feminist might actually do something because she's a celebrity even though others have said the exact same and done nothing for males in this aspect".
It's been said too much and nothing has been done about it. Until they "show" me they are doing something to help male issues, I am not going to believe their words.
As for your second last paragraph, again, that would be understandable if it wasn't backwards. Studies have found women more likely to be controlling than men, yet they just assume men are more controlling, which is them restricting men to a gender role by assumption, and so they are saying the opposite of what is true to paint women as victims, otherwise why else would they lie about it?
You're too easily convinced by feminism's pretty words. I am looking at this objectively, yes they say words that can sometimes be seen as wanting equality but stating things that aren't correct and doing nothing to help men even when saying they will isn't seeking equality, it's using the concept of equality to further your own agenda. Even God said he loves all of his children, and yet there is hell.