Lloyd.
You might want to consider actual facts.
During the fabulous 50s America taxed the rich at 70%.
They were still rich.
education, not for profit healthcare, schools, unions, and infrastructure were all top rate.
The world standard of success.
The american dream.
imports were also subject to tarrif.
What do you have today?
The mythe of trickle down economics.
The top .1%
Who make more per day then you make all year,,or more.
Controlling your input, and therefore your opinion.
You worry the rich will leave if we raise their taxs?
Good ridence bitches.
Folks like Mitt Romney made a fortune showing CEO,s in America how to move their factories to China.
F' the worker.
The CEO can make more money.
F' unions.
Do you know why toyota builds cars in america?
Its not for patriotism.
Its cheap labor, in japan they have to cover their workers with a living wage, and great benefits.
Your 54 trillion dollar healthcare plan is a scare tactic and a buzzword.
If canada and most of the E.U. can provide affordable healthcare for all, why cant we.
Are they better then us.
That kinda makes you a racist.
you think theyre better.
You need to get educated and apply common sence and logic.
faux news wont help.
Canada has death panels that decides if you are going to die or live. No company chooses to have an HQ in the EU unless they have a writeofff from the host country.
Federal systems are incredibly inefficient. The same money can go a lot father for any other already goverment controlled program. If we invest it in space we could have a Mars base.
The insurance company just tells you that you need 100k (which you can fundraise) a death panel tells you you aren't getting that liver no matter what.
Irrelevant as there are no "death panels" as youre claiming. Thats not how healthcare in civilised first world countries works. Show me an example and Ill show you something you havent understood remotely, as usual.
What purpose does a:
Return to the moon.
moon base.
or
mars base.
serve?
I like the ( concept )
Of us exploring space.
Ashamed we havent moved forward more quickly.
But at the same time.
Thats a lot of money, with little return.
We should have our own house in order first.
You might picture a second earth out there.
Virgin, pure, and clean.
Youll never see it.
The .0001% will.
Youll just help pay the costs.
That said, you diverted topic.
Your example of healthcare is grossly exaggerated.
I dont blame you.
Youre just a victim of special interest money.
You become convinced to vote against your own best interest.
shit happens, I voted for W too.
Election 2020
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Lloyd.
You might want to consider actual facts.
During the fabulous 50s America taxed the rich at 70%.
They were still rich.
education, not for profit healthcare, schools, unions, and infrastructure were all top rate.
The world standard of success.
The american dream.
imports were also subject to tarrif.
What do you have today?
The mythe of trickle down economics.
The top .1%
Who make more per day then you make all year,,or more.
Controlling your input, and therefore your opinion.
You worry the rich will leave if we raise their taxs?
Good ridence bitches.
Folks like Mitt Romney made a fortune showing CEO,s in America how to move their factories to China.
F' the worker.
The CEO can make more money.
F' unions.
Do you know why toyota builds cars in america?
Its not for patriotism.
Its cheap labor, in japan they have to cover their workers with a living wage, and great benefits.
Your 54 trillion dollar healthcare plan is a scare tactic and a buzzword.
If canada and most of the E.U. can provide affordable healthcare for all, why cant we.
Are they better then us.
That kinda makes you a racist.
you think theyre better.
You need to get educated and apply common sence and logic.
faux news wont help.
--
LloydAsher
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-2
-2
Canada has death panels that decides if you are going to die or live. No company chooses to have an HQ in the EU unless they have a writeofff from the host country.
Federal systems are incredibly inefficient. The same money can go a lot father for any other already goverment controlled program. If we invest it in space we could have a Mars base.
--
blinkeredharlot
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
TerriAngel
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No they dont but the US does and they call them insurance companies
--
LloydAsher
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
The insurance company just tells you that you need 100k (which you can fundraise) a death panel tells you you aren't getting that liver no matter what.
--
blinkeredharlot
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Irrelevant as there are no "death panels" as youre claiming. Thats not how healthcare in civilised first world countries works. Show me an example and Ill show you something you havent understood remotely, as usual.
What purpose does a:
Return to the moon.
moon base.
or
mars base.
serve?
I like the ( concept )
Of us exploring space.
Ashamed we havent moved forward more quickly.
But at the same time.
Thats a lot of money, with little return.
We should have our own house in order first.
You might picture a second earth out there.
Virgin, pure, and clean.
Youll never see it.
The .0001% will.
Youll just help pay the costs.
That said, you diverted topic.
Your example of healthcare is grossly exaggerated.
I dont blame you.
Youre just a victim of special interest money.
You become convinced to vote against your own best interest.
shit happens, I voted for W too.