Well if anyone has taken a basic economic class then trump would be way more popular vs people who want a 54 trillion dollar healthcare package.
Well just tax the billionaires! Says the liberal. Not realizing that billionaires will just move away to tax haven countries. So now you got to tax a lower and lower bracket of the population. This would be costly enough if they also wanted ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS to get it as well.
I've seen what federal healthcare does for the standard of care. It goes to the ground in quality and efficency.
Healthcare for everyone is possible and efficient.
USA is way outdated on this topic.
So because bilionaires might leave, you don't want to tax them? You know that's retarded right?
No you haven't. As I said, your contry is outdated. Countries with "free" healthcare are doing just fine and you don't have to sell your house to get treated.
Lloyd.
You might want to consider actual facts.
During the fabulous 50s America taxed the rich at 70%.
They were still rich.
education, not for profit healthcare, schools, unions, and infrastructure were all top rate.
The world standard of success.
The american dream.
imports were also subject to tarrif.
What do you have today?
The mythe of trickle down economics.
The top .1%
Who make more per day then you make all year,,or more.
Controlling your input, and therefore your opinion.
You worry the rich will leave if we raise their taxs?
Good ridence bitches.
Folks like Mitt Romney made a fortune showing CEO,s in America how to move their factories to China.
F' the worker.
The CEO can make more money.
F' unions.
Do you know why toyota builds cars in america?
Its not for patriotism.
Its cheap labor, in japan they have to cover their workers with a living wage, and great benefits.
Your 54 trillion dollar healthcare plan is a scare tactic and a buzzword.
If canada and most of the E.U. can provide affordable healthcare for all, why cant we.
Are they better then us.
That kinda makes you a racist.
you think theyre better.
You need to get educated and apply common sence and logic.
faux news wont help.
Canada has death panels that decides if you are going to die or live. No company chooses to have an HQ in the EU unless they have a writeofff from the host country.
Federal systems are incredibly inefficient. The same money can go a lot father for any other already goverment controlled program. If we invest it in space we could have a Mars base.
The insurance company just tells you that you need 100k (which you can fundraise) a death panel tells you you aren't getting that liver no matter what.
What purpose does a:
Return to the moon.
moon base.
or
mars base.
serve?
I like the ( concept )
Of us exploring space.
Ashamed we havent moved forward more quickly.
But at the same time.
Thats a lot of money, with little return.
We should have our own house in order first.
You might picture a second earth out there.
Virgin, pure, and clean.
Youll never see it.
The .0001% will.
Youll just help pay the costs.
That said, you diverted topic.
Your example of healthcare is grossly exaggerated.
I dont blame you.
Youre just a victim of special interest money.
You become convinced to vote against your own best interest.
shit happens, I voted for W too.
Election 2020
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
That's honestly the best I can hope for non voters in this country. Ugh both choices are terrible. Then vote for the one you hate the least ya smuck
--
Clunk42
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You should vote for the one you hate the least. If everyone got your mindset, the democrats might win.
--
LloydAsher
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-2
-2
Well if anyone has taken a basic economic class then trump would be way more popular vs people who want a 54 trillion dollar healthcare package.
Well just tax the billionaires! Says the liberal. Not realizing that billionaires will just move away to tax haven countries. So now you got to tax a lower and lower bracket of the population. This would be costly enough if they also wanted ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS to get it as well.
I've seen what federal healthcare does for the standard of care. It goes to the ground in quality and efficency.
--
DIO
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
3
3
-
Clunk42
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
TerriAngel
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Healthcare for everyone is possible and efficient.
USA is way outdated on this topic.
So because bilionaires might leave, you don't want to tax them? You know that's retarded right?
No you haven't. As I said, your contry is outdated. Countries with "free" healthcare are doing just fine and you don't have to sell your house to get treated.
--
LloydAsher
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You tax them at a good rate not 96%. Tax them at 30% just high enough to get a good return not high enough to justify moving out.
--
DIO
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I've never said 96%. 30% or around should be fine.
--
LloydAsher
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
That's the Bernie Sanders/ far left tax system.
Sadly, more and more people are going to gender studies, and less and less are going into economics.
--
LloydAsher
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Dont get why I get -2 likes for having a different opinion.
Lloyd.
You might want to consider actual facts.
During the fabulous 50s America taxed the rich at 70%.
They were still rich.
education, not for profit healthcare, schools, unions, and infrastructure were all top rate.
The world standard of success.
The american dream.
imports were also subject to tarrif.
What do you have today?
The mythe of trickle down economics.
The top .1%
Who make more per day then you make all year,,or more.
Controlling your input, and therefore your opinion.
You worry the rich will leave if we raise their taxs?
Good ridence bitches.
Folks like Mitt Romney made a fortune showing CEO,s in America how to move their factories to China.
F' the worker.
The CEO can make more money.
F' unions.
Do you know why toyota builds cars in america?
Its not for patriotism.
Its cheap labor, in japan they have to cover their workers with a living wage, and great benefits.
Your 54 trillion dollar healthcare plan is a scare tactic and a buzzword.
If canada and most of the E.U. can provide affordable healthcare for all, why cant we.
Are they better then us.
That kinda makes you a racist.
you think theyre better.
You need to get educated and apply common sence and logic.
faux news wont help.
--
LloydAsher
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-2
-2
Canada has death panels that decides if you are going to die or live. No company chooses to have an HQ in the EU unless they have a writeofff from the host country.
Federal systems are incredibly inefficient. The same money can go a lot father for any other already goverment controlled program. If we invest it in space we could have a Mars base.
--
blinkeredharlot
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
TerriAngel
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No they dont but the US does and they call them insurance companies
--
LloydAsher
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
The insurance company just tells you that you need 100k (which you can fundraise) a death panel tells you you aren't getting that liver no matter what.
What purpose does a:
Return to the moon.
moon base.
or
mars base.
serve?
I like the ( concept )
Of us exploring space.
Ashamed we havent moved forward more quickly.
But at the same time.
Thats a lot of money, with little return.
We should have our own house in order first.
You might picture a second earth out there.
Virgin, pure, and clean.
Youll never see it.
The .0001% will.
Youll just help pay the costs.
That said, you diverted topic.
Your example of healthcare is grossly exaggerated.
I dont blame you.
Youre just a victim of special interest money.
You become convinced to vote against your own best interest.
shit happens, I voted for W too.