Profanity, by itself, or in some circumstances (such as parody, satire, direct quotations, characterization, etc.) is not a violation.
Since the brain-dead piece of shit, who created this thoughtless piece of garbage post, has not fessed up to it, no violation has occurred.
Why would the moderators approve this thoughtless piece of shit?
The Rules are quite straightforward. Should you wish to amend or replace the Rules, then you must post these publicly, and any person can challenge these.
The Rules, are rules which All persons Should be able to live by (anywhere in the world).
Then your rules are null and void.
You can only make rules that apply to yourself, without making them public or in some instances semipublic (such as private clubs, and various private organizations, etc.) or more privately, in interpersonal relationships (family, friends, lovers, etc).
This is how the law works. You can not impose laws (or rules) on others, without their knowledge and consent. [Some totalitarian regimes & others do, however. I hope to do away with this.]
You know my Rules, and you are most welcome to challenge them. Other people have stated that they do like the Rules (at least in part), and I believe only twice (unsuccessfully) challenged them, thus I deem that to be widespread consent.
I am not forcing these Rules on you. I believe these to be basic truths. I also believe, that should we continue to ignore these Rules (remain ignorant), then none of this will matter anymore, because we will soon destroy our planet, or our Civilisation, and most likely most, if not all of us.
9 you have been ranting on and on about your stupid rules yet you're not following them yourself.
Violation.
We cannot permit this to continue. Your behavior is not meeting the high standards here at IIN.
*issues fifty demerits*
Please learn to conduct yourself more like a responsible human.
As I had explained to Parrish, I had not violated the Rules. Read them carefully.
Which Rule did I violate?
"With others"
Since no person (or a person who is at this time still anonymous) has fessed up to creating this post, and my comments were not directed at any real person, no violation has occurred.
What this means, is that if you choose to create a post, you had better be prepared to own up to it.
We don't need this type of thoughtless garbage circulating around, and inciting others.
Does racism against white people exist?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Incorrect.
Profanity, by itself, or in some circumstances (such as parody, satire, direct quotations, characterization, etc.) is not a violation.
Since the brain-dead piece of shit, who created this thoughtless piece of garbage post, has not fessed up to it, no violation has occurred.
Why would the moderators approve this thoughtless piece of shit?
--
anti-hero
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
5
5
-
robbieforgotpw
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
3
3
Violation. Rule # 93. Never question the mods.
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-2
-2
There is no "Rule # 93".
--
anti-hero
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
When did you read my rule book? That's right, you didn't. So you have no idea if there is a rule 93 or not.
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-2
-2
The Rules are quite straightforward. Should you wish to amend or replace the Rules, then you must post these publicly, and any person can challenge these.
The Rules, are rules which All persons Should be able to live by (anywhere in the world).
Where are your rules?
--
anti-hero
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
My rules are personal and I don't force them on people. Unless they force theirs on me.
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Then your rules are null and void.
You can only make rules that apply to yourself, without making them public or in some instances semipublic (such as private clubs, and various private organizations, etc.) or more privately, in interpersonal relationships (family, friends, lovers, etc).
This is how the law works. You can not impose laws (or rules) on others, without their knowledge and consent. [Some totalitarian regimes & others do, however. I hope to do away with this.]
You know my Rules, and you are most welcome to challenge them. Other people have stated that they do like the Rules (at least in part), and I believe only twice (unsuccessfully) challenged them, thus I deem that to be widespread consent.
I am not forcing these Rules on you. I believe these to be basic truths. I also believe, that should we continue to ignore these Rules (remain ignorant), then none of this will matter anymore, because we will soon destroy our planet, or our Civilisation, and most likely most, if not all of us.
9 you have been ranting on and on about your stupid rules yet you're not following them yourself.
Violation.
We cannot permit this to continue. Your behavior is not meeting the high standards here at IIN.
*issues fifty demerits*
Please learn to conduct yourself more like a responsible human.
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-5
-5
As I had explained to Parrish, I had not violated the Rules. Read them carefully.
Which Rule did I violate?
"With others"
Since no person (or a person who is at this time still anonymous) has fessed up to creating this post, and my comments were not directed at any real person, no violation has occurred.
What this means, is that if you choose to create a post, you had better be prepared to own up to it.
We don't need this type of thoughtless garbage circulating around, and inciting others.
--
robbieforgotpw
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
3
3
-
michaels4p5
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Oh in that case the demerits are rescinded.
Ok everyone, it's ok to break the rules if you can Bill Clinton out of it. It "depends on what the meaning of (is) is."
9 you're like slick Willy!
Whatcha think about that second agenda 21 piece of mine? Any opinion on the living quarters discussed?
you must be the blood loving person.