First of all, they're fetuses when they're in the woman's womb. Secondly, it's her body not yours. Third, nobody seems to notice or care whenever it's rape or incest. Fourth, nobody seems to care to feed the children after they're born or for their safety. Any party that opposes universal healthcare and gun control or supports war and the death penalty is in no position to call itself pro-life. Reality has a liberal bias. You better learn to accept that. You really should be careful when you try to use strawman arguments. Straw is highly flammable. Cheers!
Idealistically, I agree that you have a point. But you had better learn to accept the inevitability of Social Darwinism. Social Darwinism ruled the ice ages, ruled the accentuation of inequality over the centuries, and explains the dynamics of world domination. We the 1% are unstoppable. We know our interests are best served by giving you the self determination to produce wealth for our disproportionate benefit. There is a symbiosis between the middle classes and we your overlords.
Lmao at "social Darwinism ruled the ice ages". I think you meant to say "survival of the fittest." Unless the mammoths were just tying to fit in Rich Guy. For someone that claims to be rich, you do have a poor understanding of the language you consider your own.
Please read the comment about cultural anthropology. Yes, physical survival was more important in the ice age that it was afterwards. And, it is different than social selection of hunting team leaders, and ways that meat from the kill was distributed. There are many rules and customs within a tribal society that will give certain members long term advantages over the others.
If you think we are all equal in today's world, you are pathetically blinded by your own idealism. Get a life, and get a job.
Oh please! Cyber tough guy! You don't scare me. It wasn't Charles Darwin who came up with that phrase, "Survival of the fittest." That was Spencer. Read your history first if you want me to take you seriously! Now get back to work!
First off it's only the woman's choice to have the baby, kill it or keep it so the MAN can pay child support.
Sure, it's the woman's body, but the man has no say if he wants it or not.
Plenty of people CARE if rape or incest was the way the woman was impregnated. That makes a big difference between someone who wants to abort the child or someone who uses abortion as a form of birth control.
There's a HUGE difference between PRO life. On one hand you/we are talking about a baby who anyone should want to live. On the other hand you're usually talking about some sick bastard that raped and killed people and far lefties fully believe they should live and the babies should die.
You're welcome to feed all those starving orphaned children if you think it's so wrong. Take a trip to India sometime. And just so you know kids that grow up in foster care are three times more likely to grow up to be criminal sociopaths.
There's no excuse for starving kids anywhere and when tons of countries toss out tons of money, food and medicine to help them and they don't receive it, it's not a reason to wish them dead. That's where again you're wrong. Rather than the easy fix of offing some baby why not focus on truly helping those children? But, because of these third world leaders and even 1st world we're all under the assumption we can't help? We could, but we don't.
I know plenty of kids who grew up in foster care, adopted and they are just as normal as the next kid who wasn't. I know many kids who grew up in great homes, perfect families, money etc. who grew up to be losers.
You're assuming far too much when it comes to life, Daugenstein.
I'm not saying this can all be solved, but most anything can be if people really cared. First things first you need to care about children.
I just love how all the gun nuts use strawman arguments and try to bring up abortion when they're caught talking out of their asses. Gun control and abortion are apples and oranges.
Which are the "gun nuts"? The pro-2nd Amendment people who want laws enforced? OR the more-and-more gun control people who end up treating criminals as victims of society?
I don't know of ANYONE who treats gunmen who mow down people as victims of society. I highly doubt the NRA gives a shit about the law, either. Keep drinking the kool-aid. This is why I'm so glad I live abroad away from all this.
Does everyone REALLY think arming teachers will stop gun violence?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
First of all, they're fetuses when they're in the woman's womb. Secondly, it's her body not yours. Third, nobody seems to notice or care whenever it's rape or incest. Fourth, nobody seems to care to feed the children after they're born or for their safety. Any party that opposes universal healthcare and gun control or supports war and the death penalty is in no position to call itself pro-life. Reality has a liberal bias. You better learn to accept that. You really should be careful when you try to use strawman arguments. Straw is highly flammable. Cheers!
--
Rich_Guy
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
jaystrong
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Idealistically, I agree that you have a point. But you had better learn to accept the inevitability of Social Darwinism. Social Darwinism ruled the ice ages, ruled the accentuation of inequality over the centuries, and explains the dynamics of world domination. We the 1% are unstoppable. We know our interests are best served by giving you the self determination to produce wealth for our disproportionate benefit. There is a symbiosis between the middle classes and we your overlords.
Now, get back to work.
--
Ummitsme
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
Daugenstein2
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Lmao at "social Darwinism ruled the ice ages". I think you meant to say "survival of the fittest." Unless the mammoths were just tying to fit in Rich Guy. For someone that claims to be rich, you do have a poor understanding of the language you consider your own.
--
Rich_Guy
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Please read the comment about cultural anthropology. Yes, physical survival was more important in the ice age that it was afterwards. And, it is different than social selection of hunting team leaders, and ways that meat from the kill was distributed. There are many rules and customs within a tribal society that will give certain members long term advantages over the others.
If you think we are all equal in today's world, you are pathetically blinded by your own idealism. Get a life, and get a job.
Oh please! Cyber tough guy! You don't scare me. It wasn't Charles Darwin who came up with that phrase, "Survival of the fittest." That was Spencer. Read your history first if you want me to take you seriously! Now get back to work!
First off it's only the woman's choice to have the baby, kill it or keep it so the MAN can pay child support.
Sure, it's the woman's body, but the man has no say if he wants it or not.
Plenty of people CARE if rape or incest was the way the woman was impregnated. That makes a big difference between someone who wants to abort the child or someone who uses abortion as a form of birth control.
There's a HUGE difference between PRO life. On one hand you/we are talking about a baby who anyone should want to live. On the other hand you're usually talking about some sick bastard that raped and killed people and far lefties fully believe they should live and the babies should die.
--
Daugenstein2
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You're welcome to feed all those starving orphaned children if you think it's so wrong. Take a trip to India sometime. And just so you know kids that grow up in foster care are three times more likely to grow up to be criminal sociopaths.
--
jaystrong
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
There's no excuse for starving kids anywhere and when tons of countries toss out tons of money, food and medicine to help them and they don't receive it, it's not a reason to wish them dead. That's where again you're wrong. Rather than the easy fix of offing some baby why not focus on truly helping those children? But, because of these third world leaders and even 1st world we're all under the assumption we can't help? We could, but we don't.
I know plenty of kids who grew up in foster care, adopted and they are just as normal as the next kid who wasn't. I know many kids who grew up in great homes, perfect families, money etc. who grew up to be losers.
You're assuming far too much when it comes to life, Daugenstein.
I'm not saying this can all be solved, but most anything can be if people really cared. First things first you need to care about children.
--
Daugenstein2
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I just love how all the gun nuts use strawman arguments and try to bring up abortion when they're caught talking out of their asses. Gun control and abortion are apples and oranges.
--
Sunshinegirl
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Which are the "gun nuts"? The pro-2nd Amendment people who want laws enforced? OR the more-and-more gun control people who end up treating criminals as victims of society?
--
Daugenstein2
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I don't know of ANYONE who treats gunmen who mow down people as victims of society. I highly doubt the NRA gives a shit about the law, either. Keep drinking the kool-aid. This is why I'm so glad I live abroad away from all this.