I completely understand, and would never bash anyone for their sexual orientation. I just disagree that it's 'normal'. There's a reason why most men and women are sexually attracted to an 'appropriate' partner. Sexual attraction and who one may ACTUALLY have sex with will differ, of course, I'm just speaking on the base attraction here.
The purpose of sex is to reproduce, nothing more (yes, we've made it into more, and we do it for other reasons, but biologically speaking it's for reproduction). Obviously, if you're overwhelmingly compelled to have sex with someone/something that will not result in offspring then there's something wrong. BUT that's just on a biological level, I'm not saying that 'gays are wrong and shouldn't exist'. I'm just saying from a survival of the species point of view, it's a defect. And not normal.
What do weasels do? I looked and looked for any scrap of what you might be referring to and nothing points to anything remotely close to males raping newborn females (or whatever). All the information I found was actually contrary to that, mainly since weasels are solitary and a male and female wouldn't be living together, a sexually mature male shouldn't be present to molest the babies.
Yes, but the definition of normal goes a bit beyond "what is needed" in human society.
On the reproduction basis, anything starting from oral sex and anal sex to diverse fetishes like BDSM, exhibitionism, watersports or bondage are all not normal.
Now while many things MAY be specialized, the general consensus seems to be that human sexuality goes BEYOND mere reproduction.
As for weasels, yep, they are solitary. If the mother(who alone stays with the young) is out gathering food, a close-by male will sometimes enter the den and pre-impregnate the young females.
But the basic point i tried to make is that in mother nature, or what is defined as "normal" in reproduction, females will be mated with as soon and sometimes before they are ready to be impregnated, and sometimes against their will. So from that point of view, having sex with a 11-year old that already has her period would be more "normal" than oral sex with a consenting partner. That's why i'm trying to say it's not something tolerable, but not something unnatural or abnormal in the grander context. Placing it in a "unnatural and mentally ill"-area is equivalent to denying the problem, because to find an effective solution, you must first accept the problem for what it is.
Children are innocent, and don't understand sex. Pedophila is wrong, whether it is normal or not. Now many people will disagree with me here because they have never been sexually abused as a child, and simply don't understand it. Children get raped everyday, and normalizing pedophila is not going to help society.
Does being a pedophile make one a "bad"person?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I completely understand, and would never bash anyone for their sexual orientation. I just disagree that it's 'normal'. There's a reason why most men and women are sexually attracted to an 'appropriate' partner. Sexual attraction and who one may ACTUALLY have sex with will differ, of course, I'm just speaking on the base attraction here.
The purpose of sex is to reproduce, nothing more (yes, we've made it into more, and we do it for other reasons, but biologically speaking it's for reproduction). Obviously, if you're overwhelmingly compelled to have sex with someone/something that will not result in offspring then there's something wrong. BUT that's just on a biological level, I'm not saying that 'gays are wrong and shouldn't exist'. I'm just saying from a survival of the species point of view, it's a defect. And not normal.
What do weasels do? I looked and looked for any scrap of what you might be referring to and nothing points to anything remotely close to males raping newborn females (or whatever). All the information I found was actually contrary to that, mainly since weasels are solitary and a male and female wouldn't be living together, a sexually mature male shouldn't be present to molest the babies.
--
TerryVie
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Yes, but the definition of normal goes a bit beyond "what is needed" in human society.
On the reproduction basis, anything starting from oral sex and anal sex to diverse fetishes like BDSM, exhibitionism, watersports or bondage are all not normal.
Now while many things MAY be specialized, the general consensus seems to be that human sexuality goes BEYOND mere reproduction.
As for weasels, yep, they are solitary. If the mother(who alone stays with the young) is out gathering food, a close-by male will sometimes enter the den and pre-impregnate the young females.
But the basic point i tried to make is that in mother nature, or what is defined as "normal" in reproduction, females will be mated with as soon and sometimes before they are ready to be impregnated, and sometimes against their will. So from that point of view, having sex with a 11-year old that already has her period would be more "normal" than oral sex with a consenting partner. That's why i'm trying to say it's not something tolerable, but not something unnatural or abnormal in the grander context. Placing it in a "unnatural and mentally ill"-area is equivalent to denying the problem, because to find an effective solution, you must first accept the problem for what it is.
Thats what i'm trying to say.
--
Tottolotto
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Children are innocent, and don't understand sex. Pedophila is wrong, whether it is normal or not. Now many people will disagree with me here because they have never been sexually abused as a child, and simply don't understand it. Children get raped everyday, and normalizing pedophila is not going to help society.
Mustelids are fucking awesome.