Yes that's true, but believers are also more likely to be condemned at the same time, eternal hellfire's a clue, by not obeying all the rules needed in the Bible, by following the wrong church and therefore due to their disobedience even to the point of "hypocrisy" and watching "Desperate Housewives", it makes sense that this is more in line with the orange personality when focus needs to be purely on blue. Religious people shouldn't watch television, they shouldn't even go to the theatre, nor watch drama or entertainment. Television and theatre (including the cinema) is a distraction from religion and often irreligious and it's a sin, but atheists have it really easy: they can do what they want: "no gods, no masters", and commit any sins they want (which have consequences). What an atheist should do is follow no morals, morals are part of religion, there's no such thing as a sin. The reality is atheism isn't good, it's not good to disbelieve in gods unless you have a million dollars when you can afford not to be religious and not even an atheist and instead be worldly. Rich people are worldly, meaning they're secular, they don't care about positive religions like gods, or negative religions like denying gods or religions, they don't care about religions at all, they're not religious, they're not irreligious, they're secular, and not even atheists.
Right you are my man. Secularists have no interest in other people's delusions. Clunk's delusions about God, atheist's delusions about whatever, absolutely do not matter. We profess that there is beauty in the creation of wealth.
Perhaps by statistical anomaly there may be correlation between Clunk's religious beliefs and his taste in cars. This would make a secularist want to produce and market goods to make Clunk happy with the delusions he already has. There are also implications for society. I work on missiles that balance power to ensure peace. Peaceful delusion in a society is good for sales. I would never work on preemptable weapons because they only encourage the first shot to be fired. Sales might be good initially, but economic prosperity never lasts during a war.
Secularists would like to tell the world that we don't fucking care about your deluded views and ideals. Keep spending your money; we will create advertising that helps you to enjoy it. We want our goods and services to make you feel good inside with the delusions that already fill your brain.
Yet you have deluded views of your own, and seem to appreciate sharing them. You believe there is beauty in the creation of wealth. That's not true; there is no inherent beauty in wealth.
Yes, a primitive mind like yours would not be able to comprehend the economic interdependence that fuels civilization and gives people better lives. I believe you do not have the reasoning ability for this level of conversation.
The first thing you said is wrong, but the second is technically correct. Technically, anything that isn't charitable or an inherent moral good is a sin. However, it sins of such a type are forgiven in baptism and confirmation. Believers are not more likely to be damned. Atheists doing such things are also sins, and they are not just easily forgiven in baptism and confirmation, due to atheists not participating in them.
Does anyone who has a religion think this?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Yes that's true, but believers are also more likely to be condemned at the same time, eternal hellfire's a clue, by not obeying all the rules needed in the Bible, by following the wrong church and therefore due to their disobedience even to the point of "hypocrisy" and watching "Desperate Housewives", it makes sense that this is more in line with the orange personality when focus needs to be purely on blue. Religious people shouldn't watch television, they shouldn't even go to the theatre, nor watch drama or entertainment. Television and theatre (including the cinema) is a distraction from religion and often irreligious and it's a sin, but atheists have it really easy: they can do what they want: "no gods, no masters", and commit any sins they want (which have consequences). What an atheist should do is follow no morals, morals are part of religion, there's no such thing as a sin. The reality is atheism isn't good, it's not good to disbelieve in gods unless you have a million dollars when you can afford not to be religious and not even an atheist and instead be worldly. Rich people are worldly, meaning they're secular, they don't care about positive religions like gods, or negative religions like denying gods or religions, they don't care about religions at all, they're not religious, they're not irreligious, they're secular, and not even atheists.
--
MissileExpert
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
Clunk42
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Right you are my man. Secularists have no interest in other people's delusions. Clunk's delusions about God, atheist's delusions about whatever, absolutely do not matter. We profess that there is beauty in the creation of wealth.
Perhaps by statistical anomaly there may be correlation between Clunk's religious beliefs and his taste in cars. This would make a secularist want to produce and market goods to make Clunk happy with the delusions he already has. There are also implications for society. I work on missiles that balance power to ensure peace. Peaceful delusion in a society is good for sales. I would never work on preemptable weapons because they only encourage the first shot to be fired. Sales might be good initially, but economic prosperity never lasts during a war.
Secularists would like to tell the world that we don't fucking care about your deluded views and ideals. Keep spending your money; we will create advertising that helps you to enjoy it. We want our goods and services to make you feel good inside with the delusions that already fill your brain.
--
Clunk42
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Yet you have deluded views of your own, and seem to appreciate sharing them. You believe there is beauty in the creation of wealth. That's not true; there is no inherent beauty in wealth.
--
MissileExpert
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Yes, a primitive mind like yours would not be able to comprehend the economic interdependence that fuels civilization and gives people better lives. I believe you do not have the reasoning ability for this level of conversation.
The first thing you said is wrong, but the second is technically correct. Technically, anything that isn't charitable or an inherent moral good is a sin. However, it sins of such a type are forgiven in baptism and confirmation. Believers are not more likely to be damned. Atheists doing such things are also sins, and they are not just easily forgiven in baptism and confirmation, due to atheists not participating in them.