Well I don't have the scientific documentation ON ME at the moment... but I would think it would be a safe bet to say that the molecular construction of a Mono-Sodium-Glutamate molecule, and the molecular construction of a naturally-produced glutamate molecule found in nature MIGHT be completely different.
Plenty, and everything I've ever read said MSG is indistinguishable and is metabolized exactly the same as a natural glutamic acid. I've NEVER read anything to the contrary.
The first link shows that MSG is different from natural glutamate on the molecular level. Also, the link claims that our bodies contain certain levels of "free glutamate" and that we have "glutamate receptors" in the brain... This tells me that our bodies are meant to consume the natural glutamates found in certain foods (tomatoes, meat, etc...). Then the link proceeds to claim that MSG is more of a solution than a problem... and we look at the references the entire article. Government, Wikipedia, a website with chemical information and no opinion, and the International Glutamate Information Service (which I'm sure is *completely unbiased* right?).
Next we have an article from LiveStrong, yay. Upon a quick reading I find that the article only has one real reference, to someone's book. I don't give a shit if you have a PhD guys, seriously?
Next we have, LOL, the FDA. Nope.
And last, a pdf file. Neat. More government bullcrap. Nope.
Do you realize that the US Government has a vested interest in unnatural compounds? Why? Because you can't make much money from natural compounds! You can't trademark a tomato or an ear of corn... But you CAN trademark a GMO ear of corn or tomato or MSG-creating bacterium. They government has always had a vested interest in unnatural things becoming trademarked, because they make money off of them!
Let me throw a few links of my own at you:
Hey look, its LiveStrong again, and this one has more references!
http://www.livestrong.com/article/448945-monosodium-glutamate-poisoning/
Oh, and just for you... here's the government again.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2802046/
We demonstrated that (1) Treatment with MSG induces a dose-dependent swelling and death of mature neurons (12-14 days in culture) with little effect on young immature neurons (<1 week in culture). The threshold concentration of MSG for neuronal injury is 3 µM; (2) MSG only injures neurons with little effect on glial cells; (3) Boiling MSG does not affect its toxicity but the addition of Vitamin C provides significant protection against MSG toxicity; (4) Pretreatment of neurons with a low dose of MSG reduces subsequent injury by a large dose of MSG. Together, our studies suggest that the side effect of MSG may be mediated, at least in part, by its toxic effect on brain neurons. Pre-exposure to low doses of MSG or the use of Vitamin C may prevent or reduce the side effects of MSG.
Do you use MSG in your cooking?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Well I don't have the scientific documentation ON ME at the moment... but I would think it would be a safe bet to say that the molecular construction of a Mono-Sodium-Glutamate molecule, and the molecular construction of a naturally-produced glutamate molecule found in nature MIGHT be completely different.
Wouldn't you agree?
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
As far as I know, to the body they're indistinguishable and they are metabolized EXACTLY the same.
--
MissyLeyneous
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
"As far as you know"... Alrighty then, WTF DO you know? I've done a little bit of research on the subject, what have YOU done?
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Plenty, and everything I've ever read said MSG is indistinguishable and is metabolized exactly the same as a natural glutamic acid. I've NEVER read anything to the contrary.
--
MissyLeyneous
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
LINK.
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
http://www.chm.bris.ac.uk/motm/msg/msgh.htm
http://www.livestrong.com/article/329820-what-is-the-difference-between-glutamic-acid-glutamate/
http://www.fda.gov/food/foodingredientspackaging/ucm328728.htm
http://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/oc/freepubs/pdf/FN-8.pdf
--
MissyLeyneous
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
The first link shows that MSG is different from natural glutamate on the molecular level. Also, the link claims that our bodies contain certain levels of "free glutamate" and that we have "glutamate receptors" in the brain... This tells me that our bodies are meant to consume the natural glutamates found in certain foods (tomatoes, meat, etc...). Then the link proceeds to claim that MSG is more of a solution than a problem... and we look at the references the entire article. Government, Wikipedia, a website with chemical information and no opinion, and the International Glutamate Information Service (which I'm sure is *completely unbiased* right?).
Next we have an article from LiveStrong, yay. Upon a quick reading I find that the article only has one real reference, to someone's book. I don't give a shit if you have a PhD guys, seriously?
Next we have, LOL, the FDA. Nope.
And last, a pdf file. Neat. More government bullcrap. Nope.
Do you realize that the US Government has a vested interest in unnatural compounds? Why? Because you can't make much money from natural compounds! You can't trademark a tomato or an ear of corn... But you CAN trademark a GMO ear of corn or tomato or MSG-creating bacterium. They government has always had a vested interest in unnatural things becoming trademarked, because they make money off of them!
Let me throw a few links of my own at you:
Hey look, its LiveStrong again, and this one has more references!
http://www.livestrong.com/article/448945-monosodium-glutamate-poisoning/
http://www.healthychoicesbc.com/MSG/MSG.html
http://www.naturodoc.com/library/nutrition/MSG_poisoning.htm
http://rense.com/general52/msg.htm
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/192321/MSG_Are_You_Slowly_Poisoning_Yourself_
http://www.naturalnews.com/036580_MSG_poisoning_remedies_symptoms.html
http://www.oasisadvancedwellness.com/learning/msg-tables.html
http://www.resourcesforlife.com/docs/item1225
Oh, and just for you... here's the government again.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2802046/
We demonstrated that (1) Treatment with MSG induces a dose-dependent swelling and death of mature neurons (12-14 days in culture) with little effect on young immature neurons (<1 week in culture). The threshold concentration of MSG for neuronal injury is 3 µM; (2) MSG only injures neurons with little effect on glial cells; (3) Boiling MSG does not affect its toxicity but the addition of Vitamin C provides significant protection against MSG toxicity; (4) Pretreatment of neurons with a low dose of MSG reduces subsequent injury by a large dose of MSG. Together, our studies suggest that the side effect of MSG may be mediated, at least in part, by its toxic effect on brain neurons. Pre-exposure to low doses of MSG or the use of Vitamin C may prevent or reduce the side effects of MSG.
TRUST BUT VERIFY, DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.