First, how is it incorrect? You could start a religion based on anything. And Second, it's your opinion that my comment is incorrect. Third, I did not say "We need to start a religion on this." Then you said, "Incorrect, what we will need to do is...." All I said was that it was enough instruction to start a religion on. If I am guessing your motives correctly, and you're trying to actually do good by saying this. That's adorable. I don't mean that sarcastically. It's actually adorable. Also, what is your understanding of the nature of the universe?
What I have discovered, radically changes everyone's Philosophy, whether they are religious, or whether they are not religious.
It is my opinion that we were all incorrect, not just you. I include myself in this.
My understanding of the Universe, is that we have been 'looking' (more like sensing) it backwards, but there is more to it than this. We have also made understanding the actual nature of the Universe far more complex than it needs to be (anyone with a reasonable amount of intelligence could understand this). I have also discovered a 'hidden' part of the Universe, which is all around us, if you know how and where to look (again this is not complex). I am also in communication with a Very Highly Advanced Technological Civilisation (VHATC-L2), as a result and consequence of this discovery. We are not alone in this Universe! There are also many other aspects to this, which would be too lengthy to discuss here.
I would be happy to hear these other aspects. You seem like a lunatic, but other's have been called crazy and proven that they were the sane ones. I would be very interested in hearing about this, real or not. Message me?
Do you think, the meaning of life can be found through science?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Incorrect.
What we will need to do, is to re-think Philosophy as a whole.
I now understand the actual nature of the Universe, and as a consequence of this, it turns out that we were ALL incorrect, myself included.
--
et12356
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
First, how is it incorrect? You could start a religion based on anything. And Second, it's your opinion that my comment is incorrect. Third, I did not say "We need to start a religion on this." Then you said, "Incorrect, what we will need to do is...." All I said was that it was enough instruction to start a religion on. If I am guessing your motives correctly, and you're trying to actually do good by saying this. That's adorable. I don't mean that sarcastically. It's actually adorable. Also, what is your understanding of the nature of the universe?
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
All religions have an underlying Philosophy.
What I have discovered, radically changes everyone's Philosophy, whether they are religious, or whether they are not religious.
It is my opinion that we were all incorrect, not just you. I include myself in this.
My understanding of the Universe, is that we have been 'looking' (more like sensing) it backwards, but there is more to it than this. We have also made understanding the actual nature of the Universe far more complex than it needs to be (anyone with a reasonable amount of intelligence could understand this). I have also discovered a 'hidden' part of the Universe, which is all around us, if you know how and where to look (again this is not complex). I am also in communication with a Very Highly Advanced Technological Civilisation (VHATC-L2), as a result and consequence of this discovery. We are not alone in this Universe! There are also many other aspects to this, which would be too lengthy to discuss here.
--
handsomeshooter
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
et12356
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Oh Earlie...you must stop looking for those doors...
I would be happy to hear these other aspects. You seem like a lunatic, but other's have been called crazy and proven that they were the sane ones. I would be very interested in hearing about this, real or not. Message me?