Firstly, one needs to know, 'what is science?', as some people have a misunderstanding of this.
sci·ence\ˈsī-ən(t)s\
noun
1 : the state of knowing : knowledge as distinguished from ignorance or misunderstanding
2a : a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study <the science of theology>
b : something (as a sport or technique) that may be studied or learned like systematized knowledge <have it down to a science>
3a : knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method
b : such knowledge or such a system of knowledge concerned with the physical world and its phenomena : natural science
4 : a system or method reconciling practical ends with scientific laws <cooking is both a science and an art>
5 capitalized : archaic : [Divided Oxymoron]
Examples
the science of medicine grew tremendously in the course of the 19th century
Origin: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin scientia, from scient-, sciens having knowledge, from present participle of scire to know; perhaps akin to Sanskrit chyati he cuts off, Latin scindere to split — more at shed.
First use: 14th century
Synonyms: lore, knowledge, wisdom
Next, one needs to ask, 'what is not science?'
Some people might argue that art, religion, and the humanities, are not science.
But don't all these things rely on some form of technological innovation? Answer: Yes. These things could not exist without science.
So what's left? Answer: Ignorance, misunderstanding, unpredictability and fantasy.
But, ignorance, misunderstanding and unpredictability, can all be predicted using various scientific methodologies.
So what is not science? Answer: fantasy.
The "Meaning of Life", has been codified, and various sciences were the determining factor.
But, did fantasy also play a role? I most certainly used abstract thought processes in this.
These are the Rules:
1) Survive in good health.
2) Reproduce; but not to the extent of overpopulation and the detrimental effects thereof.
3) Learn about this Earth / Universe in whichever field(s) of study best suits you.
4) Work smart and efficiently, but a little hard work now and again is probably a good thing too.
5) Be happy, keep a good sense of humour and enjoy the pursuits of life (recreation).
6) Try to get along with others. If you can't get along, graciously walk away or try to negotiate a mutually agreeable separation (friendship, family, love and property, etc.).
7) Be charitable, but not to the point of dependency (A hand up is better than a hand-out).
8) Do not impose your beliefs on others. Healthy discussion / debate is allowable.
9) Live within your means. Try to live a moderate life. Do not overindulge.
10) Be honest with yourself and others. Be polite and courteous with others.
11) Conserve energy and resources. Limit your use of plastics.
12) Be respectful of the natural environment. Do your part to prevent / control the spread of exotic and invasive flora and fauna. Encourage natural biodiversity.
13) Do not submit to corruption and criminal intent.
14) Use violence only in cases of self-defense, last resort or pre-emptive measures.
15) Make a plan. (For all applicable points above).
16) I freely admit that I have not fulfilled all of the above (to the letter), but that I try to do my best.
Any person is welcome to challenge the Rules. Any person is also welcome to change, make additions to, make deletions from, or otherwise alter or modify the Rules (for improvement thereof), with the strict proviso that ithe Rules should be ideally Universally acceptable to All persons, and that, this is done in accordance with a majority consensus in any administrative region. (This would then be acknowledged in that particular administrative region only).
Any person is also challenged to produce a better set of rules, with the proviso above, should they disagree with the Rules. They will do this of their own accord and expense, then share this with the human inhabitants of Planet Earth.
Amendments to the Rules pending...
First, how is it incorrect? You could start a religion based on anything. And Second, it's your opinion that my comment is incorrect. Third, I did not say "We need to start a religion on this." Then you said, "Incorrect, what we will need to do is...." All I said was that it was enough instruction to start a religion on. If I am guessing your motives correctly, and you're trying to actually do good by saying this. That's adorable. I don't mean that sarcastically. It's actually adorable. Also, what is your understanding of the nature of the universe?
What I have discovered, radically changes everyone's Philosophy, whether they are religious, or whether they are not religious.
It is my opinion that we were all incorrect, not just you. I include myself in this.
My understanding of the Universe, is that we have been 'looking' (more like sensing) it backwards, but there is more to it than this. We have also made understanding the actual nature of the Universe far more complex than it needs to be (anyone with a reasonable amount of intelligence could understand this). I have also discovered a 'hidden' part of the Universe, which is all around us, if you know how and where to look (again this is not complex). I am also in communication with a Very Highly Advanced Technological Civilisation (VHATC-L2), as a result and consequence of this discovery. We are not alone in this Universe! There are also many other aspects to this, which would be too lengthy to discuss here.
I would be happy to hear these other aspects. You seem like a lunatic, but other's have been called crazy and proven that they were the sane ones. I would be very interested in hearing about this, real or not. Message me?
Do you think, the meaning of life can be found through science?
← View full post
Yes and no.
Firstly, one needs to know, 'what is science?', as some people have a misunderstanding of this.
sci·ence\ˈsī-ən(t)s\
noun
1 : the state of knowing : knowledge as distinguished from ignorance or misunderstanding
2a : a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study <the science of theology>
b : something (as a sport or technique) that may be studied or learned like systematized knowledge <have it down to a science>
3a : knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method
b : such knowledge or such a system of knowledge concerned with the physical world and its phenomena : natural science
4 : a system or method reconciling practical ends with scientific laws <cooking is both a science and an art>
5 capitalized : archaic : [Divided Oxymoron]
Examples
the science of medicine grew tremendously in the course of the 19th century
Origin: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin scientia, from scient-, sciens having knowledge, from present participle of scire to know; perhaps akin to Sanskrit chyati he cuts off, Latin scindere to split — more at shed.
First use: 14th century
Synonyms: lore, knowledge, wisdom
Next, one needs to ask, 'what is not science?'
Some people might argue that art, religion, and the humanities, are not science.
But don't all these things rely on some form of technological innovation? Answer: Yes. These things could not exist without science.
So what's left? Answer: Ignorance, misunderstanding, unpredictability and fantasy.
But, ignorance, misunderstanding and unpredictability, can all be predicted using various scientific methodologies.
So what is not science? Answer: fantasy.
The "Meaning of Life", has been codified, and various sciences were the determining factor.
But, did fantasy also play a role? I most certainly used abstract thought processes in this.
These are the Rules:
1) Survive in good health.
2) Reproduce; but not to the extent of overpopulation and the detrimental effects thereof.
3) Learn about this Earth / Universe in whichever field(s) of study best suits you.
4) Work smart and efficiently, but a little hard work now and again is probably a good thing too.
5) Be happy, keep a good sense of humour and enjoy the pursuits of life (recreation).
6) Try to get along with others. If you can't get along, graciously walk away or try to negotiate a mutually agreeable separation (friendship, family, love and property, etc.).
7) Be charitable, but not to the point of dependency (A hand up is better than a hand-out).
8) Do not impose your beliefs on others. Healthy discussion / debate is allowable.
9) Live within your means. Try to live a moderate life. Do not overindulge.
10) Be honest with yourself and others. Be polite and courteous with others.
11) Conserve energy and resources. Limit your use of plastics.
12) Be respectful of the natural environment. Do your part to prevent / control the spread of exotic and invasive flora and fauna. Encourage natural biodiversity.
13) Do not submit to corruption and criminal intent.
14) Use violence only in cases of self-defense, last resort or pre-emptive measures.
15) Make a plan. (For all applicable points above).
16) I freely admit that I have not fulfilled all of the above (to the letter), but that I try to do my best.
Any person is welcome to challenge the Rules. Any person is also welcome to change, make additions to, make deletions from, or otherwise alter or modify the Rules (for improvement thereof), with the strict proviso that ithe Rules should be ideally Universally acceptable to All persons, and that, this is done in accordance with a majority consensus in any administrative region. (This would then be acknowledged in that particular administrative region only).
Any person is also challenged to produce a better set of rules, with the proviso above, should they disagree with the Rules. They will do this of their own accord and expense, then share this with the human inhabitants of Planet Earth.
Amendments to the Rules pending...
--
et12356
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
myboyfriendsbitch
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
SchumpetersGale
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You could start a religion based on this.
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Incorrect.
What we will need to do, is to re-think Philosophy as a whole.
I now understand the actual nature of the Universe, and as a consequence of this, it turns out that we were ALL incorrect, myself included.
--
et12356
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
First, how is it incorrect? You could start a religion based on anything. And Second, it's your opinion that my comment is incorrect. Third, I did not say "We need to start a religion on this." Then you said, "Incorrect, what we will need to do is...." All I said was that it was enough instruction to start a religion on. If I am guessing your motives correctly, and you're trying to actually do good by saying this. That's adorable. I don't mean that sarcastically. It's actually adorable. Also, what is your understanding of the nature of the universe?
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
All religions have an underlying Philosophy.
What I have discovered, radically changes everyone's Philosophy, whether they are religious, or whether they are not religious.
It is my opinion that we were all incorrect, not just you. I include myself in this.
My understanding of the Universe, is that we have been 'looking' (more like sensing) it backwards, but there is more to it than this. We have also made understanding the actual nature of the Universe far more complex than it needs to be (anyone with a reasonable amount of intelligence could understand this). I have also discovered a 'hidden' part of the Universe, which is all around us, if you know how and where to look (again this is not complex). I am also in communication with a Very Highly Advanced Technological Civilisation (VHATC-L2), as a result and consequence of this discovery. We are not alone in this Universe! There are also many other aspects to this, which would be too lengthy to discuss here.
--
handsomeshooter
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
et12356
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Oh Earlie...you must stop looking for those doors...
I would be happy to hear these other aspects. You seem like a lunatic, but other's have been called crazy and proven that they were the sane ones. I would be very interested in hearing about this, real or not. Message me?
I'm down with that. How about teaching our offspring to be better than ourselves? We could eliminate at least one human flaw with every generation.
Yes, the key to my happiness is in a rulebook for life