The government preventing gay marriage for religious purposes is unconstitutional. Remember that little line in there about the separation of church and state? Apart from religion I have not seen one other valid reason that gays shouldn't marry.
I get what you're saying but is there a good enough reason that they can marry?
Why don't they just call it something else and just not use the term "married" then everyones happy and there's nothing the church can argue about. But no they want to but in on it, thats what pisses me off, the fucking with someones religion just to make others happy. I see it as far more immoral than keeping marriage between a man and a woman. It opens the gateway for peoples beliefs to be trampled on.
Do you think gay people should have the right to marry?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
The government preventing gay marriage for religious purposes is unconstitutional. Remember that little line in there about the separation of church and state? Apart from religion I have not seen one other valid reason that gays shouldn't marry.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
What came first, the constitution or the church?
I get what you're saying but is there a good enough reason that they can marry?
Why don't they just call it something else and just not use the term "married" then everyones happy and there's nothing the church can argue about. But no they want to but in on it, thats what pisses me off, the fucking with someones religion just to make others happy. I see it as far more immoral than keeping marriage between a man and a woman. It opens the gateway for peoples beliefs to be trampled on.