Its a fact that heaven/hell havent been proven to exist, of course it hasnt been proven to not exist either.
Just applying simple logic to the question of life after death gives a reasonable argument against it.
Whats more logical to exist : 1. Another plane of existence where everyone who obeyed the church or lived a pious life goes where everything they ever wanted is provided for them, for everyone they ever knew to be there with them and love them and blah blah blah. OR 2. You just die and death is the absence of life and existence. You dont experience joy, you dont experience pain, you dont experience the passage of time.
I would say option 2 is alot more logical to me as well.
Do you think children should practice religion?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Its a fact that heaven/hell havent been proven to exist, of course it hasnt been proven to not exist either.
Just applying simple logic to the question of life after death gives a reasonable argument against it.
Whats more logical to exist : 1. Another plane of existence where everyone who obeyed the church or lived a pious life goes where everything they ever wanted is provided for them, for everyone they ever knew to be there with them and love them and blah blah blah. OR 2. You just die and death is the absence of life and existence. You dont experience joy, you dont experience pain, you dont experience the passage of time.
I would say option 2 is alot more logical to me as well.
--
Angel_in_a_Glass_Dress
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
option 1
=)