Yes. Holding a little child down to cut off a part of their natural body while they cry and could make the decision if they wanted to later in life, is mutilation in my eyes.
You don't think so? Would you consider female circumcision mutilation? If yes, then unless you're a sexist douche, you should see male circumcision the same, if no, well, then you're pretty much a double douche.
I fail to see the point in how it changes that they are both genital mutilation. Does that somehow justify male genital mutilation? Also, circumcision can lead to issues with the penis in later ages and can even result in death.
do you think being circumcised is mutilation?
← View full post
Yes. Holding a little child down to cut off a part of their natural body while they cry and could make the decision if they wanted to later in life, is mutilation in my eyes.
You don't think so? Would you consider female circumcision mutilation? If yes, then unless you're a sexist douche, you should see male circumcision the same, if no, well, then you're pretty much a double douche.
--
CountessDouche
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
8
8
Female circumcision removes the clitoris - it's kinda different.
--
[Old Memory]
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
I fail to see the point in how it changes that they are both genital mutilation. Does that somehow justify male genital mutilation? Also, circumcision can lead to issues with the penis in later ages and can even result in death.
--
(s)aint
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
I agree with you to a 100%.