Do you think asexual exist?
do you think asexual really exist ?
I am asexual and want to know if people know about asexual
| yes | 205 | |
| no | 78 | |
| yes, I know asexual people | 72 | |
| I am asexual | 121 | |
| what is asexual? | 64 |
Ask Your Question today
do you think asexual really exist ?
I am asexual and want to know if people know about asexual
| yes | 205 | |
| no | 78 | |
| yes, I know asexual people | 72 | |
| I am asexual | 121 | |
| what is asexual? | 64 |
I didn't think there was any doubt regarding it's existence. I am sure there are asexuals although I'm fairly sure that a few of the people that say they're asexual aren't, rather, they just have low sex drives and difficult emotionally connecting to others.
I think some of the confusion is partially a byproduct of this pervasive societal standard that would have you believe that every man should be constantly getting a boner for every hot chick that crosses his path and every girl should fawn over every guy that has good looks and a sharp style sense. What a load.
What's with the abnormally high number of asexuals here? Oh yes, most users here are kids as another thread seemed to indicate.
They have two meaning for this word. The Asexual which means to procreate by yourself which is basically making a clone. So really your whole body is asexual. As multi cellarer organisms grow by cells making clones of themselves. The only issue is each copy is a copy of another copy.
so over time you get weaker and weaker copies. Till one day you die. If you could make a perfect copy you could probably live forever but science has not perfected this yet.
Asexual also means people who do not desire self with others. Which I do might be possible for the more intelligent as they see no point, and for those who have a low sex drive and that it might happen overtime that your hormones slow down.
I don't think asexual=low sex drive. And it certainly does not mean too intelligent for sex, that's just nonsense. Some people with both low sex drive and higher intelligence together may fancy themselves to be asexual, but I still do not think such people would fit the true definition of the word. However, I'm also not saying that someone who fits the true definition of the word 'asexual' exists in real life. I have yet to know someone who calls themselves that so I am a bit skeptical about whether it really exists in an objective sense, as it seems you are.
Yes, but I think the vast majority of people that say they are asexual are not asexual. Probably none of those three are.
There was actually an asexual couple on television a while agp so it has nothing to do with failed relationships.
There is asexual couples like the person above said. They love each other like every other couple but they don't want/need sex like most people do. What you are talking about is someone who gets rejected and claim to be asexual because he cannot have any sex life. It's not the same thing.
Reading some of these comments really pisses me off :/ all this sexual shit... Is sex really the only thing people think about? It's disgusting
is skeptical an option? I don't know anyone who claims to be asexual so I'm merely skeptical.
Er, it's hard for me to be asexual.. but even though it's hard to be asexual, a lot of times I am.
I don't know anybody personalty that is asexual.
but, i know that my favorite artist Emile Autumn Liddell is asexual.
Yes and I'd like to believe that one of my friends is one. She's a pretty cool person to talk to.
A more stringent definition is agamogenesis which is reproduction without the fusion of gametes. Asexual reproduction is the primary form of reproduction for single-celled life forms such as the archaea, bacteria, and protists. Many plants and fungi reproduce asexually as well..
The offspring will [usually] be exact genetic copies of the parent.
<a href="http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asexual_reproduction" rel="nofollow">http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asexual_reproduc...</a>
This is why I don't like the term asexual being used for humans. We can't rip our arm off and spawn an offspring from it.
Whatever, it's a word with 2 different meanings, just like many others, it's no big deal. The problem is, on this site we have this douche-bag who won't give up the chance to purposely interpret incorrectly the first one of these words that he comes across, no matter how clear the context. He thinks that makes him look intelligent because he believes to be the first one to have noticed the fact that such a word could mean something else. That's how deep up his own ass he is. He's an absolute retard.