Do you support beastality?

"This is my last response to you, I have better things to do with my time & energy."

Ever?

Like, burying your head in the sand?

You know, you've missed the entire point of what I've been posting. I haven't actually stated anything that is pro-bestiality, but what I have posted doesn't align with your world view. You apparently are of the belief that anyone that isn't with you is against you. Sad.

Take for example this evolution business. You could read any number of books that would explain how evolution actually works, but then your apple cart would be jostled and who knows what you might start believing next.

Here's a quick take for your perusal...

When any given species reproduces, nature, in it's infinite wisdom, tries all sorts of mutations. That's why we end up with people with 6 toes and hermaphrodites. The mutations that give an advantage tend to get passed along to offspring where they become more and more the norm. Thus, the mammoths that wear able to adapt by becoming woolly aren't really a thing. It's actually the mammoths that just randomly happened to be woollier were better adapted to their environment, and thus the gene for woolliness was passed on.

Things don't "adapt" in a generation (things really don't adapt as such in an evolutionary sense), things that work well in a given environment tend to survive more and thus pass on those genes which happen to be better adapted to the environment.

Back to dogs... Canines did not happen to magically adapt to become useful to humans. Humans selectively bred canines for the traits they found useful. In fact, by your own, "Power forcing others with less power is wrong" argument you make people bad for ever domesticating canines, because wolves didn't automagically evolve into Pomeranians to be useful (or decorative, or whatever) to people.

Lastly, you might want to look a little harder at the whole conversation. I haven't treated you with much respect, because frankly I don't respect ignorance, and I don't have tons of time to slowly, and gently educate others, especially others that have their heels dug in and cling to falsehoods. But I certainly wouldn't characterize my responses as patronizing. I think you may be misunderstanding the correct use of that word as well. In fact, I feel like I'm seeing a pattern of close mindedness and ignorance to your posts. I'm sure you don't feel that way, but consider how articulate this post is... I'm not one of the poo flinging asshats that populate this site.

Another brief (hopefully) point: I never said there isn't morality, I said it's a human construct and it's subjective. It's not comparable to say... gravity, which is not a human construct and not at all subjective, it's a law of nature and is immutable until you get to the quantum level, which (patronizingly) I doubt you understand.

As for all your numbers and what they are supposed to track to, I have no idea.