I do understand your viewpoint a bit more now, but it did require some clarification from your original posting, not because of my failure to understand what you wrote, but because you provided insufficient information to come to the conclusion that you're up in arms defending now. I'm also curious... if you believe that it was just happenstance that the people you personally feel are "smartest and wisest" are men, why is it even worth mentioning when you concede that men have no advantage over women overall? By the logic you claim to be operating under, it's the same as pointing out that some great leader stubbed his toe the day he made a world-changing decision - it just so happened to be that way. But look at your original posting, and judge for yourself if what you wrote was simply pointing out a purely circumstantial curiosity. (And if it is, why did you think that people would be upset by it, and why did you feel compelled to say anything about it at all?)
Do you like the sex you were born with?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I do understand your viewpoint a bit more now, but it did require some clarification from your original posting, not because of my failure to understand what you wrote, but because you provided insufficient information to come to the conclusion that you're up in arms defending now. I'm also curious... if you believe that it was just happenstance that the people you personally feel are "smartest and wisest" are men, why is it even worth mentioning when you concede that men have no advantage over women overall? By the logic you claim to be operating under, it's the same as pointing out that some great leader stubbed his toe the day he made a world-changing decision - it just so happened to be that way. But look at your original posting, and judge for yourself if what you wrote was simply pointing out a purely circumstantial curiosity. (And if it is, why did you think that people would be upset by it, and why did you feel compelled to say anything about it at all?)