Every person has the choice to perceive things their own way. I perceived that second sentence to simply mean "Someone agrees with me, that means that they are logical because I am the pinnacle of logic."
You make good points, Itduz, when you stay on topic but you have a way of turning a debate into an attack on a person's emotional stability. Questioning their logical. In turn by doing this, I just get the vibe that you're a little hurt by what other people say about you. Thus, you're not emotionally stable yourself, cause if you were I would think you'd be smart enough to know not to waste your time with some users and just not reply at all.
But I don't think I'm the pinnacle of logic. I just know at this particular time, there was no logical reason to thumb it down, because the things I listed were things that you need to do in certain activities, and engaging in an activity then not doing what the activity requires is just illogical.
I only question their emotion over logic when they do things such as insult but not stay on topic, or thumb down for no reason. If they stick on topic, I stick on topic.
I am not emotionally hurt, I am irritated because I can't understand why they would choose to do something, then "choose" to be illogical.
Unfortunatly, I am not like that. If someone replies to me, I have to reply back to them, unless we have reached a conclusion in which we both agree on. Usually now, if people do this, I just reply to them saying something on repeat until they want to engage in debnate logically instead of just plain insults.
I believe you when you say that you don't think of yourself as the pinnacle of logic. However, you act like you are towards others by questioning their logic and calling them emotionally unstable. I'll admit that I get irritated when someone thumbs down my comments, especially if I put a lot of effort into writing it. Also, I can understand replying back to people even if you know that they're just out to push your buttons. But you have to admit, if the first thing they say is an insult then why stoop down to their level? Some people can't debate, so arguing with them would only serve the purpose of irritating you.
Also, I read your recent story about losing respect for the IIN community. I would like to say this. People on this site don't hate you. From time to time they might get annoyed, like how they get annoyed by Allistala. But overall I think that you are liked on website. Personally, and I hope that I'm not sounding gay by saying this, I would miss you if you were gone, and I'm sure a lot of people would to.
I only do that when they are being more emotional than logical, when it's obvious, when their "contibution" to what it is they are commenting to has no logic behind it. I call them more emotional than logical when they have no reason to dissagree, when I make points that if you dissgree with, then you're obviously lacking logic. I am not being big headed there, my original comment here demonstrates what I am saying. I stated that by engaging in an activity but unwilling to do what the activity requirs, yet won't leave the activity, they're being illogical...And they dissagreed...
I have no problem with people dissagreeing with me or thumbng me down even if I have wrote pages of paragraphs, aslong as it sticks on topic, replies to each point made, and doesn't refuse to answer questions that would prove them wrong. If someone thumbs me down and explains why, then I can accept that. They explained why, and if I can, I will express how their reasons aren't logical (if they aren't). Instead, they just thumbs down, even when it supports the claim that they're being illogical, then they complain when I call them illogical for their illogical behavior.
Because I usually think they are worth the time, regardless of them saying things I dissagree with, that we can come to a conclusion. Another reason why is because if you let a stupid point by, it'll get thumbsed up to the max. I would have a logical counter, yet I am to be seen as not able to logcially counter what they said, which I don't like. Then you have to deal with idiots like, and yes I am going to name the person directly, Thinkingaboutit, that thinks if you ignore them, they're smarter than you...I also dislike that. If someone is smarter than me, then I want them to prove it by answering everything they can logically, instead of being illogical. If they do that, I can accept them being smarter than me. There are many people on here smarter than me, and those people have said I am wrong on many occasions, and some have proven me wrong, and I happily admit to them doing so.
Meh, I don't think so. I think people do dislike me. Maybe they don't hate me, but dislike me, and I can accept that aslong as it doesn't interfere with any conversations we have. I think a very few would miss me, but atleast those few would, which I'm greatful for.
If a person has to resort to insults then just don't argue with them. Replying to their comment is just feeding the trolls. I've seen that user and he pretty much just uses insults. He doesn't argue, but you feed him by replying.
Do you have IIN enemies?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Every person has the choice to perceive things their own way. I perceived that second sentence to simply mean "Someone agrees with me, that means that they are logical because I am the pinnacle of logic."
You make good points, Itduz, when you stay on topic but you have a way of turning a debate into an attack on a person's emotional stability. Questioning their logical. In turn by doing this, I just get the vibe that you're a little hurt by what other people say about you. Thus, you're not emotionally stable yourself, cause if you were I would think you'd be smart enough to know not to waste your time with some users and just not reply at all.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
But I don't think I'm the pinnacle of logic. I just know at this particular time, there was no logical reason to thumb it down, because the things I listed were things that you need to do in certain activities, and engaging in an activity then not doing what the activity requires is just illogical.
I only question their emotion over logic when they do things such as insult but not stay on topic, or thumb down for no reason. If they stick on topic, I stick on topic.
I am not emotionally hurt, I am irritated because I can't understand why they would choose to do something, then "choose" to be illogical.
Unfortunatly, I am not like that. If someone replies to me, I have to reply back to them, unless we have reached a conclusion in which we both agree on. Usually now, if people do this, I just reply to them saying something on repeat until they want to engage in debnate logically instead of just plain insults.
--
Anime7
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
I believe you when you say that you don't think of yourself as the pinnacle of logic. However, you act like you are towards others by questioning their logic and calling them emotionally unstable. I'll admit that I get irritated when someone thumbs down my comments, especially if I put a lot of effort into writing it. Also, I can understand replying back to people even if you know that they're just out to push your buttons. But you have to admit, if the first thing they say is an insult then why stoop down to their level? Some people can't debate, so arguing with them would only serve the purpose of irritating you.
Also, I read your recent story about losing respect for the IIN community. I would like to say this. People on this site don't hate you. From time to time they might get annoyed, like how they get annoyed by Allistala. But overall I think that you are liked on website. Personally, and I hope that I'm not sounding gay by saying this, I would miss you if you were gone, and I'm sure a lot of people would to.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I only do that when they are being more emotional than logical, when it's obvious, when their "contibution" to what it is they are commenting to has no logic behind it. I call them more emotional than logical when they have no reason to dissagree, when I make points that if you dissgree with, then you're obviously lacking logic. I am not being big headed there, my original comment here demonstrates what I am saying. I stated that by engaging in an activity but unwilling to do what the activity requirs, yet won't leave the activity, they're being illogical...And they dissagreed...
I have no problem with people dissagreeing with me or thumbng me down even if I have wrote pages of paragraphs, aslong as it sticks on topic, replies to each point made, and doesn't refuse to answer questions that would prove them wrong. If someone thumbs me down and explains why, then I can accept that. They explained why, and if I can, I will express how their reasons aren't logical (if they aren't). Instead, they just thumbs down, even when it supports the claim that they're being illogical, then they complain when I call them illogical for their illogical behavior.
Because I usually think they are worth the time, regardless of them saying things I dissagree with, that we can come to a conclusion. Another reason why is because if you let a stupid point by, it'll get thumbsed up to the max. I would have a logical counter, yet I am to be seen as not able to logcially counter what they said, which I don't like. Then you have to deal with idiots like, and yes I am going to name the person directly, Thinkingaboutit, that thinks if you ignore them, they're smarter than you...I also dislike that. If someone is smarter than me, then I want them to prove it by answering everything they can logically, instead of being illogical. If they do that, I can accept them being smarter than me. There are many people on here smarter than me, and those people have said I am wrong on many occasions, and some have proven me wrong, and I happily admit to them doing so.
Meh, I don't think so. I think people do dislike me. Maybe they don't hate me, but dislike me, and I can accept that aslong as it doesn't interfere with any conversations we have. I think a very few would miss me, but atleast those few would, which I'm greatful for.
--
Anime7
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
If a person has to resort to insults then just don't argue with them. Replying to their comment is just feeding the trolls. I've seen that user and he pretty much just uses insults. He doesn't argue, but you feed him by replying.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yeah, that is probably the best conclusion to such people like Thinkingaboutit. The user is a female, though. Just thought I should clear that up.
--
Anime7
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
I thought Thinkingaboutit was a guy this whole time.