You:
Took five times for you to acknowledge the dictionary quote I took that I quoted from the dictionary. Number one.
You thought that in order to prove "your" point, the person that you're saying is wrong and is challenging your point has to do the research. You think you have no need to show reliable sources of information. Number two. -EDIT- And it wasn't that you could do it, you tried and failed, then when you realized there was nothing that supports your claim, you thought simply not having to try again covered that up. Number two.
Easy one. Eugenics. Number three.
Number four. You are offended that you run under these things, and you know you run under this list, so you try to reply to say that I do the exact same thing, regardless of people able to tell you that when I have been "proven" wrong, I accept it, unlike you.
Yes, I have issues. I tried to have a logical debate with someone that says that the dictionary isn't a reliable source of information for word definitions. What was I thinking. You're right, I do have issues, trying to have a logical debate with such a person is just terrible.
-EDIT-
Once again, I give examples that show my point. What do you have? Nothing so far.
You claim that I "just described myself". I will assume you "think" I do this all the time, so give me an example of where I have done this, at all.
(Waits for the "I can state anything, I don't need proof, I said it, that means it must be true)
Do you have IIN enemies?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
-Facepalm-
You:
Took five times for you to acknowledge the dictionary quote I took that I quoted from the dictionary. Number one.
You thought that in order to prove "your" point, the person that you're saying is wrong and is challenging your point has to do the research. You think you have no need to show reliable sources of information. Number two. -EDIT- And it wasn't that you could do it, you tried and failed, then when you realized there was nothing that supports your claim, you thought simply not having to try again covered that up. Number two.
Easy one. Eugenics. Number three.
Number four. You are offended that you run under these things, and you know you run under this list, so you try to reply to say that I do the exact same thing, regardless of people able to tell you that when I have been "proven" wrong, I accept it, unlike you.
Yes, I have issues. I tried to have a logical debate with someone that says that the dictionary isn't a reliable source of information for word definitions. What was I thinking. You're right, I do have issues, trying to have a logical debate with such a person is just terrible.
-EDIT-
Once again, I give examples that show my point. What do you have? Nothing so far.
You claim that I "just described myself". I will assume you "think" I do this all the time, so give me an example of where I have done this, at all.
(Waits for the "I can state anything, I don't need proof, I said it, that means it must be true)
--
Allistalla
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
You always write a ton.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
3
3
That's because I have a ton of things to talk about. I state my argument and explain why I believe those arguments are true. I also give examples.
Most people here just state their opinion without giving any reason or example to show why it should be seen as reliable information, where as I do.
It's not that I write a ton, it's that they write too little.
--
Allistalla
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
well backing up your detail is important. Good you put such thought into your posts.