Battle for rational thinking. As a species, a lot of our intelligence has been passed down due to categorizing material, species, technology, and so on. If one is better or does more than another of the same group, they are seen as more superior in that group, yet somehow that is not allowed in scenarios in which involvs genders, and we both know why.
Irrational? So your idea of rational is to believe that instead of actually fousing on the debate, you try to get personal? Regardless of what you saying being so amazingly off (get to that later)? You think that is rational? Don't call other people irrational when you can only name something as irrational, yet can't explain why it's irrational, then expect to be seen as the rational one here for trying to assume things you have no knowledge on since you don't know me personally. If you want to speak about rationality, you belong on the student chair, not the teacher whiteboard.
Now on to the actual parts in which you assume such things in a complete laughable matter.
I am a virgin, I have no troubles admitting to that, and why? Because I have never tried to have sex. I wouldn't say that I am asexual, but lacking in motivation to do the things before getting sex, or putting myself in a scenario which would make a one night stand, such as clubbing, parties, etc, I hate them (And yes, I have been to a few, and I have been invited many times, so hold your tongue). Besides that, I have had people bluntly ask me for sex, and more implying sex by saying things such as "do you want to stay at my place" when there is no need for me to (I rejected). I have also been sexually harrassed, and in a minor form, sexually assaulted by women and men. Other than that, I knew a girl in Wales that was actually a prostitute (a real one). She asked "me" for sex with no charge..."I" rejected.
Right now I have a female that I can only describe as perfect (appearance wise) trying to talk to me on Facebook. Infact, I am putting this message to you over a gorgeous female. Do I want to have sex with her? No. Personally, I find her appearance as art, not sexually attracted to her.
Believe me when I tell you, if you are trying to imply, insinuate, or bluntly say that I am the one being rejected, you should stick to things other than personal issues that you know nothing about. If you would like I could post my previous Facebook picture of myself. As a matter of fact, regardless of me not agreeing to it, I apparantly look like the IIN "Dorian Gray" according to a specific user. I can't remember their name, they may have been male, not sure.
So just ask, and up that picture goes for you to be shown how stupid it is to say that I am constantly rejected. DO I plan on having sex at some point? Definetly, but not now.
What I love, and you know, I can really have no question in my mind right now that you're female, really. Only women seem to do this. When "they" can't be rational on a gender topic, it's because the man arguing is just sexually rejected, it can be the only reason, right? Women don't want sex with him, that's why he defends the male gender, right? Yet if we were to say women that do the same are just fat lezbians that can't get a man, that's out of line, right?
Listen, little girl, you are not God's gift. If you think we dislike women for some of the things they do simply because we can't get you, then you need to get out of your little princess state of mind, because in truth, compared to the greatness of the male gender, you're merely a spec.
Oh wow. I look like an embaressment to someone that thinks rational thinking is "you're just angry because girls won't have sex with you". My. You're so right, what was I thinking. I definetly should take what you said about me being an embaressment, because you have clearly demonstrated your oh so great rational thinking to me. My apologies, princess. The real reason why I am not agreeing with you is because you won't fuck me. Forgive me, princess.
Darling, I couldn't read all your answer since I don't have the time. I have a life to attend to.
But me, get over myself? You have to be joking! You're the one who twists every single comment to how women are so useless etc. Well guess what, women exist, we aren't going nowhere so you'll just have to get over it and get on with it. Stop making yourself look like an absolute idiot making disgusting comments about how much you hate women.
I am certainly not wanting a argument, I am telling you how you are making yourself look like. You're coming across as an anger filled, irrational woman hater. Do you really want to be portrayed as that? Really? And guess what, a LOT of people will back me up on this. A LOT of people have noticed how much time you spend on hatred towards women. THATS LIFE, GET OVER IT.
Lol! Ofcourse. Typical. Again, you're being completely irrational. You insist on commenting on single parts without reading it all. So smart.
Yes, get over yourself. If you had read it (pretty sure you did, you just don't want to reply to it), then you would of understood.
Actually, you're wrong. Don't pressume to say that I say women are useless, because I have never said that. Again, you are so rational.
Once again, I do not hate women. Just because something is superior to the other does not mean the inferior thing is hated. I do not hate women at all.
You don't want an argument, yet you were willing to be petty and try insult me? Now that I shoved all those petty insults back in your face, "now" you don't want to argue. Pfft.
You are telling me from "your" opinion, and all your opinions so far are wrong about me. You think I hate women, which I don't. You think saying that they aren't equal to the male gender means I hate them, and then you are trying to say I'm irrational. Good job.
Yes, I am coming across that way to "women". Why is that? Because as soon as they are offended, everyone else but them are wrong.
I am in no way being irrational here. You have yet to answer anything I ask, yet I'm irrational?
"You're wrong, but I don't need to prove you're wrong. You're irrational, but I don't need to explain why you're irrational". How...rational of you.
By women, I don't care how I'm portrayed. You clearly imply indirectly that in order to not be portrayed like that, I have to be a little suck up and avoid facts that might offend the itty bitty princesses.
I have no doubt that a lot of people will back you. I also have no doubt that the vast majority of them will be female. And guess what, I don't care if females agree with you. Why would I care that people that say something is irrational only if they get offended back you up on this? Why?
I also have no doubt that the majority of these people would be people I debated with before and shown them to be wrong.
Once again, I don't hate women. You sure your immaturity, and prove my point further. You are offended by what I say that you misunderstand the difference between seeing something as inferior and hating something.
You just demonstrated yourself of one of my points.
Genders are not immune to facts. It is a fact men have been superior at most things and have made nearly everything we need in our society, and that they built civilization.
"THAT'S LIFE, GET OVER IT".
Do you believe love conquers all?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Battle for rational thinking. As a species, a lot of our intelligence has been passed down due to categorizing material, species, technology, and so on. If one is better or does more than another of the same group, they are seen as more superior in that group, yet somehow that is not allowed in scenarios in which involvs genders, and we both know why.
Irrational? So your idea of rational is to believe that instead of actually fousing on the debate, you try to get personal? Regardless of what you saying being so amazingly off (get to that later)? You think that is rational? Don't call other people irrational when you can only name something as irrational, yet can't explain why it's irrational, then expect to be seen as the rational one here for trying to assume things you have no knowledge on since you don't know me personally. If you want to speak about rationality, you belong on the student chair, not the teacher whiteboard.
Now on to the actual parts in which you assume such things in a complete laughable matter.
I am a virgin, I have no troubles admitting to that, and why? Because I have never tried to have sex. I wouldn't say that I am asexual, but lacking in motivation to do the things before getting sex, or putting myself in a scenario which would make a one night stand, such as clubbing, parties, etc, I hate them (And yes, I have been to a few, and I have been invited many times, so hold your tongue). Besides that, I have had people bluntly ask me for sex, and more implying sex by saying things such as "do you want to stay at my place" when there is no need for me to (I rejected). I have also been sexually harrassed, and in a minor form, sexually assaulted by women and men. Other than that, I knew a girl in Wales that was actually a prostitute (a real one). She asked "me" for sex with no charge..."I" rejected.
Right now I have a female that I can only describe as perfect (appearance wise) trying to talk to me on Facebook. Infact, I am putting this message to you over a gorgeous female. Do I want to have sex with her? No. Personally, I find her appearance as art, not sexually attracted to her.
Believe me when I tell you, if you are trying to imply, insinuate, or bluntly say that I am the one being rejected, you should stick to things other than personal issues that you know nothing about. If you would like I could post my previous Facebook picture of myself. As a matter of fact, regardless of me not agreeing to it, I apparantly look like the IIN "Dorian Gray" according to a specific user. I can't remember their name, they may have been male, not sure.
So just ask, and up that picture goes for you to be shown how stupid it is to say that I am constantly rejected. DO I plan on having sex at some point? Definetly, but not now.
What I love, and you know, I can really have no question in my mind right now that you're female, really. Only women seem to do this. When "they" can't be rational on a gender topic, it's because the man arguing is just sexually rejected, it can be the only reason, right? Women don't want sex with him, that's why he defends the male gender, right? Yet if we were to say women that do the same are just fat lezbians that can't get a man, that's out of line, right?
Listen, little girl, you are not God's gift. If you think we dislike women for some of the things they do simply because we can't get you, then you need to get out of your little princess state of mind, because in truth, compared to the greatness of the male gender, you're merely a spec.
Oh wow. I look like an embaressment to someone that thinks rational thinking is "you're just angry because girls won't have sex with you". My. You're so right, what was I thinking. I definetly should take what you said about me being an embaressment, because you have clearly demonstrated your oh so great rational thinking to me. My apologies, princess. The real reason why I am not agreeing with you is because you won't fuck me. Forgive me, princess.
Get. Over. Your. Self.
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Darling, I couldn't read all your answer since I don't have the time. I have a life to attend to.
But me, get over myself? You have to be joking! You're the one who twists every single comment to how women are so useless etc. Well guess what, women exist, we aren't going nowhere so you'll just have to get over it and get on with it. Stop making yourself look like an absolute idiot making disgusting comments about how much you hate women.
I am certainly not wanting a argument, I am telling you how you are making yourself look like. You're coming across as an anger filled, irrational woman hater. Do you really want to be portrayed as that? Really? And guess what, a LOT of people will back me up on this. A LOT of people have noticed how much time you spend on hatred towards women. THATS LIFE, GET OVER IT.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Lol! Ofcourse. Typical. Again, you're being completely irrational. You insist on commenting on single parts without reading it all. So smart.
Yes, get over yourself. If you had read it (pretty sure you did, you just don't want to reply to it), then you would of understood.
Actually, you're wrong. Don't pressume to say that I say women are useless, because I have never said that. Again, you are so rational.
Once again, I do not hate women. Just because something is superior to the other does not mean the inferior thing is hated. I do not hate women at all.
You don't want an argument, yet you were willing to be petty and try insult me? Now that I shoved all those petty insults back in your face, "now" you don't want to argue. Pfft.
You are telling me from "your" opinion, and all your opinions so far are wrong about me. You think I hate women, which I don't. You think saying that they aren't equal to the male gender means I hate them, and then you are trying to say I'm irrational. Good job.
Yes, I am coming across that way to "women". Why is that? Because as soon as they are offended, everyone else but them are wrong.
I am in no way being irrational here. You have yet to answer anything I ask, yet I'm irrational?
"You're wrong, but I don't need to prove you're wrong. You're irrational, but I don't need to explain why you're irrational". How...rational of you.
By women, I don't care how I'm portrayed. You clearly imply indirectly that in order to not be portrayed like that, I have to be a little suck up and avoid facts that might offend the itty bitty princesses.
I have no doubt that a lot of people will back you. I also have no doubt that the vast majority of them will be female. And guess what, I don't care if females agree with you. Why would I care that people that say something is irrational only if they get offended back you up on this? Why?
I also have no doubt that the majority of these people would be people I debated with before and shown them to be wrong.
Once again, I don't hate women. You sure your immaturity, and prove my point further. You are offended by what I say that you misunderstand the difference between seeing something as inferior and hating something.
You just demonstrated yourself of one of my points.
Genders are not immune to facts. It is a fact men have been superior at most things and have made nearly everything we need in our society, and that they built civilization.
"THAT'S LIFE, GET OVER IT".