Yes and no. I think it definitively has to be there, but it shouldn't be an option all of the time. For example, I know this was a long time ago, but look at Ted Bundy. He killed 40+ women, and when he was in jail, he escaped TWICE, and killed more. If they hadn't put him to death, he would have escaped yet again and kept killing more people. I think they did the right thing by putting him to death, because by doing so, they saved lots of innocent women from getting brutally murdered.
But it should only be used in cases like that, not on so many people. That I think isn't the right thing to do, especially if the evidence is circumstantial.
do you agree with the death penalty?
← View full post
Yes and no. I think it definitively has to be there, but it shouldn't be an option all of the time. For example, I know this was a long time ago, but look at Ted Bundy. He killed 40+ women, and when he was in jail, he escaped TWICE, and killed more. If they hadn't put him to death, he would have escaped yet again and kept killing more people. I think they did the right thing by putting him to death, because by doing so, they saved lots of innocent women from getting brutally murdered.
But it should only be used in cases like that, not on so many people. That I think isn't the right thing to do, especially if the evidence is circumstantial.
--
Lynxikat
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Agreed.