Laws are there to protect you and to protect others from you.
They are not made by any one individual, but voted for by many.
I think laws that protect human rights are a good thing and should be obeyed by everyone.
On the other hand, government does come up with some ridiculous laws to protect the politician's corrupt asses and personal interests, at out disadvantage and try to sneak them through under our noses.
Such laws should not be allowed or tolerated by anyone.
I am not concerned with "others", and the "many" are my enemy. People like to pretend that "democracy" and "mob rule" are not synonymous, when they definitely are.
If laws exist to protect human rights, why are homeless people forbidden to sleep in public? Why are people allowed to make millions of dollars per year, when others are starving? Why is war legal?
To me, anarchy is preferable to an imperfect government. I know that only the strong would survive under such circumstances, but I am the strong, so the point is moot.
We have these things called weapons. Doesn't matter how strong you are when it comes to guns, bombs, etc. Plus the rich people could create nukes without laws in place. An anarchy would be a living hell, and much of civilization would be destroyed.
Do you agree with my stance on man-made law systems?
← View full post
Laws are there to protect you and to protect others from you.
They are not made by any one individual, but voted for by many.
I think laws that protect human rights are a good thing and should be obeyed by everyone.
On the other hand, government does come up with some ridiculous laws to protect the politician's corrupt asses and personal interests, at out disadvantage and try to sneak them through under our noses.
Such laws should not be allowed or tolerated by anyone.
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I am not concerned with "others", and the "many" are my enemy. People like to pretend that "democracy" and "mob rule" are not synonymous, when they definitely are.
If laws exist to protect human rights, why are homeless people forbidden to sleep in public? Why are people allowed to make millions of dollars per year, when others are starving? Why is war legal?
To me, anarchy is preferable to an imperfect government. I know that only the strong would survive under such circumstances, but I am the strong, so the point is moot.
--
CreamPuffs
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
"I am the strong"
We have these things called weapons. Doesn't matter how strong you are when it comes to guns, bombs, etc. Plus the rich people could create nukes without laws in place. An anarchy would be a living hell, and much of civilization would be destroyed.