OK, then just go by the conviction (a fact) and stop assuming that the offenders didn't deserve what they got (speculation). You can't exactly cry 'speculation' and then speculate yourself. If you want to go on facts and not speculation then be consistent.
I didn't say that the offender didn't deserve what he got. That's a red herring. The point you're avoiding addressing is that the compass of sex offences includes offences far less serious than rape and abuse.
Who says I care to differentiate as far as my stance on 'no second chances' is concerned? I said I don't give second chances to sex offenders. That means all.
Do sex offenders deserve a second chance?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Not typically unless there was more at play. Let's be honest here.
--
johnpartridge
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-3
-3
Let's not speculate here.
--
wigz
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Yeah, let's not speculate that a criminal case probably has some nuance to it.
--
johnpartridge
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-3
-3
It may well have a nuance to it. We don't know, and I'm not in the business of peddling ad ingoratiums.
--
wigz
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
OK, then just go by the conviction (a fact) and stop assuming that the offenders didn't deserve what they got (speculation). You can't exactly cry 'speculation' and then speculate yourself. If you want to go on facts and not speculation then be consistent.
--
johnpartridge
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I didn't say that the offender didn't deserve what he got. That's a red herring. The point you're avoiding addressing is that the compass of sex offences includes offences far less serious than rape and abuse.
--
wigz
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Who says I care to differentiate as far as my stance on 'no second chances' is concerned? I said I don't give second chances to sex offenders. That means all.