That first link here. I visited it. This is a screenshot of the linked stories.
http://imgur.com/a/oa8jq
The second link you posted is. Not. There.
Unless I go to the desktop view. Which is not what you linked me to. Hence me saying I'm doing your work for you and "yammering on about desktop". If you want to prove a point, don't make everyone else do you work for you.
Desktop view:
http://imgur.com/a/t3XVd
Regardless, this in itself does not prove your hypothesis. It is far more likely that the stories share similar tags and the "same" OP think is a fluke.
OK, whether you see it on desktop or mobile, YOU STILL SEE IT. I don't know why it differs like that but either way you see what I am pointing out. This is a non-issue.
"this in itself does not prove your hypothesis"
What the fuck? What is my hypothesis? I simply observed this happening more than what could be chalked up to coincidence. There's tens of thousands of posts on this site, it would be a longshot to get one of your own posts in that small section if it were truly randomly generated, let alone having it happen over and over in a chain. I said I noticed the "check out these other posts" section links posts by the same author. Lo and behold, I showed numerous instances of this very thing happening. That IS proof. It's proof of what I claim to have observed. How is it not? I also never said it was some grand conspiracy. If I had to guess why this happens I'd lean towards the site being very basic.
On your first comment, you said --->"Nnn...no. no they aren't necessarily. Maybe by fluke now and then, but certainly not as a rule."
Now you want to claim it's because of tags, which by definition, would be a "rule". Make up your mind. You keep shifting the goalposts to suit yourself, I provide proof of what you initially deny and now it's all of a sudden not a random fluke but based on tags.
Did you ever notice this at the bottom of the page?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Fuck me, you're just not that bright.
That first link here. I visited it. This is a screenshot of the linked stories.
http://imgur.com/a/oa8jq
The second link you posted is. Not. There.
Unless I go to the desktop view. Which is not what you linked me to. Hence me saying I'm doing your work for you and "yammering on about desktop". If you want to prove a point, don't make everyone else do you work for you.
Desktop view:
http://imgur.com/a/t3XVd
Regardless, this in itself does not prove your hypothesis. It is far more likely that the stories share similar tags and the "same" OP think is a fluke.
--
Anonymous Post Author
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-4
-4
OK, whether you see it on desktop or mobile, YOU STILL SEE IT. I don't know why it differs like that but either way you see what I am pointing out. This is a non-issue.
"this in itself does not prove your hypothesis"
What the fuck? What is my hypothesis? I simply observed this happening more than what could be chalked up to coincidence. There's tens of thousands of posts on this site, it would be a longshot to get one of your own posts in that small section if it were truly randomly generated, let alone having it happen over and over in a chain. I said I noticed the "check out these other posts" section links posts by the same author. Lo and behold, I showed numerous instances of this very thing happening. That IS proof. It's proof of what I claim to have observed. How is it not? I also never said it was some grand conspiracy. If I had to guess why this happens I'd lean towards the site being very basic.
--
charli.m
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Someone's touchy.
--
Anonymous Post Author
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-4
-4
http://m.isitnormal.com/poll/are-people-unreasonable-at-times-241223/
To
http://m.isitnormal.com/poll/have-you-accepted-most-people-are-going-to-let-you-down-240372/
To
http://m.isitnormal.com/poll/is-it-normal-for-a-waiver-to-take-this-long-240720/
To
http://m.isitnormal.com/poll/does-this-site-have-moderation-at-all-240211/
To
http://m.isitnormal.com/poll/why-the-truth-is-a-matter-of-opinion-240923/
--
charli.m
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
What part of "tags" are you not understanding, you retard?
I'm not disagreeing that you're finding this. I'm giving an alternate and far more realistic reason for it, but you insist on monging it up.
Have at it. There's no fixing stupid.
--
Anonymous Post Author
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-2
-2
On your first comment, you said --->"Nnn...no. no they aren't necessarily. Maybe by fluke now and then, but certainly not as a rule."
Now you want to claim it's because of tags, which by definition, would be a "rule". Make up your mind. You keep shifting the goalposts to suit yourself, I provide proof of what you initially deny and now it's all of a sudden not a random fluke but based on tags.