Listen, you can diss these things however you like, but the truth remains that they bring sexual satisfaction to all parties involved. Now, that's life, and sometimes you trade some of this for some of that.
Human beings generally want three main things: emotional satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and security. If you place a premium on ensuring #1 and #3, then you most likely won't get #2, or not as much as you'd like to. You want to go all dignity this, psychosis that, fine, but you're gonna have to do without a sexually fulfilling life. That's the usual trade-off. It'll just be good old missionary three days a week with a nice guy, and making love, feeling equal, and that's that. And if you're fine with that, then that's fine.
By the way, "use" wasn't referring to deception, but to physical use, as in using her body like a piece of meat, having full control over it, something like that. And you can claim women don't need to be subdued and dominated to truly feel female, but you know that's BS. That's what the female truly craves sexually, a dominant force that overpowers her in one way or another. Again, you may lead a nice little pretty Mitt Romney / feminist / gender studies life without it, but you'll never be as sexually satisfied, feeling that ecstasy, that release, as when you experience and feel that.
My solution is as closest as you can get to obtaining all three, i.e. by having a man you can trust providing security and emotional connection, while at the same time having authority over you to also provide sexual fulfillment. And there's no razor edge when I'm around to handle things, because I know exactly what I want to do and what to expect from the experience, and my girls knows that. You don't want the authority part? You want to take the self-respect and dignity and equality and sexual morality route? Okay. But do know that all this does is lull the sexual beast in you into a temporary slumber. And the the beast won't go away, it'll keep lurking beneath the surface, still wanting craving being made to submit, and wanting to feel the superior power and authority over you. And it won't be satisfied with dialogue with an equal lackluster significant other, perhaps not even role-playing. It just wants to be used, made to, and done to, preferably by a man who can also make her feel secure and cherished.
Well, that's one way to go. Though it sounds to me more like a "cut your nose to spite your face" type of thing. You're willing to forgo men altogether because one of those hot sex sessions got out of hand? The blame should go to those particular guys you were with, or on that particular incident, or on whoever failed to keep things under control. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Did you ever get gangbanged?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Listen, you can diss these things however you like, but the truth remains that they bring sexual satisfaction to all parties involved. Now, that's life, and sometimes you trade some of this for some of that.
Human beings generally want three main things: emotional satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and security. If you place a premium on ensuring #1 and #3, then you most likely won't get #2, or not as much as you'd like to. You want to go all dignity this, psychosis that, fine, but you're gonna have to do without a sexually fulfilling life. That's the usual trade-off. It'll just be good old missionary three days a week with a nice guy, and making love, feeling equal, and that's that. And if you're fine with that, then that's fine.
By the way, "use" wasn't referring to deception, but to physical use, as in using her body like a piece of meat, having full control over it, something like that. And you can claim women don't need to be subdued and dominated to truly feel female, but you know that's BS. That's what the female truly craves sexually, a dominant force that overpowers her in one way or another. Again, you may lead a nice little pretty Mitt Romney / feminist / gender studies life without it, but you'll never be as sexually satisfied, feeling that ecstasy, that release, as when you experience and feel that.
My solution is as closest as you can get to obtaining all three, i.e. by having a man you can trust providing security and emotional connection, while at the same time having authority over you to also provide sexual fulfillment. And there's no razor edge when I'm around to handle things, because I know exactly what I want to do and what to expect from the experience, and my girls knows that. You don't want the authority part? You want to take the self-respect and dignity and equality and sexual morality route? Okay. But do know that all this does is lull the sexual beast in you into a temporary slumber. And the the beast won't go away, it'll keep lurking beneath the surface, still wanting craving being made to submit, and wanting to feel the superior power and authority over you. And it won't be satisfied with dialogue with an equal lackluster significant other, perhaps not even role-playing. It just wants to be used, made to, and done to, preferably by a man who can also make her feel secure and cherished.
--
nikkiclaire
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Or I can have wild fullfilling monkey sex with my girlfriend.
To each his own.
--
Anonymous Post Author
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Well, that's one way to go. Though it sounds to me more like a "cut your nose to spite your face" type of thing. You're willing to forgo men altogether because one of those hot sex sessions got out of hand? The blame should go to those particular guys you were with, or on that particular incident, or on whoever failed to keep things under control. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
--
nikkiclaire
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Incorrect analogy. I flushed turds down the toilet. 😊 Enjoy your day.
--
Anonymous Post Author
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You're throwing away hot sex because you place a premium on security, was my point. Not a wise call.