This is not helpful at all. It is very confusing and contains factual inaccuracies. It does not answer the questions that I have asked. You have once again used an Anglo-Germanic generic term for a deity, but did not answer who or what this deity is?
You have (thrice) used words that divide persons in society from others, but have not answered why you are doing so. You are reckless in your words and manners.
The Bible is not a book that belongs solely to one branch of the Abrahamic religions. Part of what you said affirms this, but is still not factually correct. Other persons also believe in some parts of the Bible. The Torah is not the Bible for the traditional Judaic branch of the Abrahamic religions, the Tanakh is.
Parts of the Bible were written well before Jesus of Nazareth was born. How could it include Jesus if he was not born yet?
conflict of faith?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
This is not helpful at all. It is very confusing and contains factual inaccuracies. It does not answer the questions that I have asked. You have once again used an Anglo-Germanic generic term for a deity, but did not answer who or what this deity is?
You have (thrice) used words that divide persons in society from others, but have not answered why you are doing so. You are reckless in your words and manners.
The Bible is not a book that belongs solely to one branch of the Abrahamic religions. Part of what you said affirms this, but is still not factually correct. Other persons also believe in some parts of the Bible. The Torah is not the Bible for the traditional Judaic branch of the Abrahamic religions, the Tanakh is.
Parts of the Bible were written well before Jesus of Nazareth was born. How could it include Jesus if he was not born yet?