Fascism. It's very realistic in its beliefs, it seeks to keep the nation healthy and racist, thus finally recognizing that there are differences between races at a national level (seriously, everybody knows that for every species of animals some races are smarter than others but in humans it's all different because feelings and left-wing shit), it rejects mass migration which obviously doesn't work (I'd have invaders killed & impaled because the reason we're alive now is that our ancestors died fighting them to protect us), it resists very well to cuckoldry currents and garbage influences, it wouldn't allow feminization and trashy trends to poison the country, it makes a nation feared by others and imposes respect, it protects them very well from threats and, if not abused, it keeps the country and its people intact. Too bad it was abused by Hitler and now it died, while communism very much adapted and is now a powerful regime in the world. Fascism could have adapted to the 21st century in a more passive-aggresive form, resulting in an insanely strong nationalist spirit and fortresses that protect the countries from threats.
Communism, in its pure form, is horrible, it deprives people from rights and individuality. It can be abused much more easily, it leads to starvation and human degradation, it forces you into overworking and insane labour and it kills people for lunatic propaganda.
I prefer capitalism over all these, but between those two, I pick fascism anytime, because the fascist mentality is realistic, when applied correctly, while the communist one is inherently bad irreconcilable with human nature.
And fascism dosent deny people rights and individuality or has a insane propaganda agenda of its own.
So you'd rather have a society that treats others on the bases of genetics rather then personal merit how is that realistic.
I don't get how you could pick one bad idea with another bad idea both have a lot more in common the main one being that they creat a society that is submissive.
I'd rather have neither and I don't understand why anyone would want to be apart of either.
Yes, the pure form of fascism sounds horrible. But an adapted mixed politics like communism achieved in China with a lot of "capitalistic" influence seems to be really effective in protecting them as a state and in forming them as people. I would have a state like that but in the far-right direction. Let's say a National Capitalist state instead of a National Socialist one that empowered Hitler to do so much damage to other nations. Let's call it NatCap instead of NatSoc. A strong sense of unity is what I'd want to see.
Communism or fascism
← View full post
Fascism. It's very realistic in its beliefs, it seeks to keep the nation healthy and racist, thus finally recognizing that there are differences between races at a national level (seriously, everybody knows that for every species of animals some races are smarter than others but in humans it's all different because feelings and left-wing shit), it rejects mass migration which obviously doesn't work (I'd have invaders killed & impaled because the reason we're alive now is that our ancestors died fighting them to protect us), it resists very well to cuckoldry currents and garbage influences, it wouldn't allow feminization and trashy trends to poison the country, it makes a nation feared by others and imposes respect, it protects them very well from threats and, if not abused, it keeps the country and its people intact. Too bad it was abused by Hitler and now it died, while communism very much adapted and is now a powerful regime in the world. Fascism could have adapted to the 21st century in a more passive-aggresive form, resulting in an insanely strong nationalist spirit and fortresses that protect the countries from threats.
Communism, in its pure form, is horrible, it deprives people from rights and individuality. It can be abused much more easily, it leads to starvation and human degradation, it forces you into overworking and insane labour and it kills people for lunatic propaganda.
I prefer capitalism over all these, but between those two, I pick fascism anytime, because the fascist mentality is realistic, when applied correctly, while the communist one is inherently bad irreconcilable with human nature.
--
Anonymous Post Author
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
And fascism dosent deny people rights and individuality or has a insane propaganda agenda of its own.
So you'd rather have a society that treats others on the bases of genetics rather then personal merit how is that realistic.
I don't get how you could pick one bad idea with another bad idea both have a lot more in common the main one being that they creat a society that is submissive.
I'd rather have neither and I don't understand why anyone would want to be apart of either.
--
[Old Memory]
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Not sure if you asked this to see our opinions or you asked just to argue with us about how your opinion differs from ours.
Good, you want none of them. Got it.
--
Anonymous Post Author
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No I see your opinion I just don't agree with it as I said I don't like either.
--
[Old Memory]
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yes, the pure form of fascism sounds horrible. But an adapted mixed politics like communism achieved in China with a lot of "capitalistic" influence seems to be really effective in protecting them as a state and in forming them as people. I would have a state like that but in the far-right direction. Let's say a National Capitalist state instead of a National Socialist one that empowered Hitler to do so much damage to other nations. Let's call it NatCap instead of NatSoc. A strong sense of unity is what I'd want to see.