1. Rhetoric straight out the gate, yet again. You're claiming that I stated the reason they transitioned was due to "hype", I never referred to Trans people transitioning for popularity. I'm not going to bother continuing with this point as it is evidently clear you're just throwing shit at the wall now to hope something sticks and I can't be bothered getting caught in that retarded game.
2. "Of fucking _course_ they don't state that's going to happen"
Then don't fucking try to slip in vagaries to imply that they do. Cunt rag.
3.
4. The fact that you took a study on a group of people from a time where you describe it as taboo to be such a person and don't understand that you can't use that study to compare it to a time where that very same group of people get instant value in society merely for existing and how that could potentially change the findings of a similar recreated study done after the popularity of that group boomed is hilarious. Again I've let you pivot entirely because it might be the case that the vast majority of Trans people don't regret their decision but it is still a completely reasonable to point out that people like you will encourage people to transition but won't tell them about the massive hit to their love life that would follow, and we know that it's followed because there is now a trend growing where Trans people are lacking in a love life that a lot of them are trying to shame people into sleeping with them with the idea that not wanting to be sexually active with a trans person is in itself bigoted. Then we could mix in that transgender people umpteen times more likely to be autistic, which I wonder if that would influence anything regarding this topic when a bunch of autistic people have large groups telling them what is the best course of action is for their identity to solve their problems.
Also, yeah, 1970-2010 isn't 50 years, dropped the ball there looking at different studies and pairing it with my point that it's different in 2020. Kudos.
5. "I'm right, the people say so, you narcissist!" Lol ok. I need a coffee, I feel like there's a lot of preaching coming up.
"Forget the skirts!". I'm not interested enough to hold you to it.
This next bit is just a repeat at throwing more shit against the wall for the point #1. I never vilified Trans people at all, I vilified people like you and did so bluntly without tact, which was my intention. The rest is just preaching but I'm just not interested, dude.
Aw, shit. Tbf I'm an understanding Q Anon, I think Hillary just likes a Pizza topping more closer to home.
Awww, noooooo. You've dedicated a whole paragraph towards talking about how smart you are. Fucking end me.
Holy fuck. These representations are hilarious. How me insulting your intelligence can somehow have you conclude it as me actually fawning over your "formidable, well-versed art"? is just a great example of my impression of you being valid. You're just more of the same.
Like, dude, we've been through enough discussions to know you're trash at this. From the, "Ad hom and Red Herring" shit where you fell into using the very fallacies you lied about me using and then tried to claim it was a "master plan" just to avoid accountability.
Or when you posted studies to claim conservatives are just dumb compared to liberals and then when I read them it was referring to "social conservatives" so then you had the audacity to pretend that you weren't talking about conservatives in general but a specific set of conservatives that you didn't even mention until I corrected you.
Now you're trying to use a 50 year study to prove your point yet I have to explain to you why it can't be used because the culture around the topic has drastically changed, and you even admit so to a degree but think because it would change in your favour we should just assume the prior one is accurate.
So in Summary:
- You accept my position that there has been a drastic change in the culture regarding the topic but you think outdated data can be used.
- You admit that the 2 year evaluation to refute my position doesn't actually include the problem my position is about.
- You abandoned your skirt analogy after my criticism of it.
- You somehow think that I consider your rhetoric well made even though I've been insulting you for it.
Like at what point do I take you seriously after these experiences with you, my dude?
Whoa, whoa, whoa. Did you just imply that anybody that disagrees with you isn't a Q follower? Oooft. Now if you excuse me I have tea plans with Hitler and Satan.
Yes. I disagree with rational people sometimes as well.
I'm just curious. Do you or do you not think there's some substance to be found in Q? If you do, why not just say it? There's nothing to be ashamed of if it's substantial after all.
And don't fucking lie to me like that again, young man; I _am_ Satan and Hitler is shuffling cards less than six feet away from me because we don't give a _fuck_ about social distancing in this bitch.
Wow. Did you just imply Q Anon people can be rational? Wow.
I'm just curious why you think I haven't noticed you changing the subject and trying to compensate in this completely irrelevant topic, especially a disingenuous one because we both know that regardless of what I say you will still try to give the impression that I believe in Q Anon shit. Bait and switch, S.W, bait and switch. You're not nearly as intelligent as you think you are to subtly make such a play.
Ah, so you're telling me you play the cards Hitler deals you. I can believe it. Also, we live in a society.
"Did you just imply Q Anon people can be rational?"
I feel like you meant "can't".
If so, 100%. I absolutely just implied that, at least that they can't while still a part of that. Perhaps they can break out later but they're currently mentally ill.
If you meant "can", no. I absolutely did not imply that.
No. If you fully denounce Q I will take your word for it, at least at this point.
"You're not nearly as intelligent as you think you are--"
Fuck. That's not good at all. I already don't even _think_ I'm very intelligent at all. In fact, I suspect humans in current form will never achieve our goal of unifying gravity with quantum mechanics because we simply aren't even close to sufficiently intelligent. Yet we speak of when it will finally happen. 100 years? 200 years? The thought that humans being the most intelligent species on the planet just happens to coincide with being sufficiently intelligent to fully mathematically understand the entire universe is one hell of a foolish assumption. I feel that chimps too likely believe they can understand everything with enough time. We aren't much further along.
All that expressed, with this new information from you I now feel like a self-aware ugly person just hearing that claim that we're all five times uglier than we think of our appearance in the mirror. Horrible news indeed.
I do at least feel perhaps slightly more intelligent than the average bear when debating regarding things like dark matter versus MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics) as the explanation for the apparent disparity between observed galactic mass and the actual gravitational behavior thereof, but that's because I have to push myself and it's really difficult material. I don't feel particularly challenged by things like determining the sum of two and two, whether or not it's hypocritical to act outraged at alleged trans victimizers only to make fun of trans people, and simply reading numbers on simple graphs.
That's more like a UFC champion beating up a little kid on the playground; there's something wrong with you if it's an ego boost, if things _that_ simple make you feel intelligent. Rather, unlike assaulting children, this is just something that socially has to be done, albeit begrudgingly.
No. I don't play cards that Hitler deals me; he's just the dealer in the casino I'm running in Hell. The house always wins.
Broke up with cis wife
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
1. Rhetoric straight out the gate, yet again. You're claiming that I stated the reason they transitioned was due to "hype", I never referred to Trans people transitioning for popularity. I'm not going to bother continuing with this point as it is evidently clear you're just throwing shit at the wall now to hope something sticks and I can't be bothered getting caught in that retarded game.
2. "Of fucking _course_ they don't state that's going to happen"
Then don't fucking try to slip in vagaries to imply that they do. Cunt rag.
3.
4. The fact that you took a study on a group of people from a time where you describe it as taboo to be such a person and don't understand that you can't use that study to compare it to a time where that very same group of people get instant value in society merely for existing and how that could potentially change the findings of a similar recreated study done after the popularity of that group boomed is hilarious. Again I've let you pivot entirely because it might be the case that the vast majority of Trans people don't regret their decision but it is still a completely reasonable to point out that people like you will encourage people to transition but won't tell them about the massive hit to their love life that would follow, and we know that it's followed because there is now a trend growing where Trans people are lacking in a love life that a lot of them are trying to shame people into sleeping with them with the idea that not wanting to be sexually active with a trans person is in itself bigoted. Then we could mix in that transgender people umpteen times more likely to be autistic, which I wonder if that would influence anything regarding this topic when a bunch of autistic people have large groups telling them what is the best course of action is for their identity to solve their problems.
Also, yeah, 1970-2010 isn't 50 years, dropped the ball there looking at different studies and pairing it with my point that it's different in 2020. Kudos.
5. "I'm right, the people say so, you narcissist!" Lol ok. I need a coffee, I feel like there's a lot of preaching coming up.
"Forget the skirts!". I'm not interested enough to hold you to it.
This next bit is just a repeat at throwing more shit against the wall for the point #1. I never vilified Trans people at all, I vilified people like you and did so bluntly without tact, which was my intention. The rest is just preaching but I'm just not interested, dude.
Aw, shit. Tbf I'm an understanding Q Anon, I think Hillary just likes a Pizza topping more closer to home.
Awww, noooooo. You've dedicated a whole paragraph towards talking about how smart you are. Fucking end me.
Holy fuck. These representations are hilarious. How me insulting your intelligence can somehow have you conclude it as me actually fawning over your "formidable, well-versed art"? is just a great example of my impression of you being valid. You're just more of the same.
Like, dude, we've been through enough discussions to know you're trash at this. From the, "Ad hom and Red Herring" shit where you fell into using the very fallacies you lied about me using and then tried to claim it was a "master plan" just to avoid accountability.
Or when you posted studies to claim conservatives are just dumb compared to liberals and then when I read them it was referring to "social conservatives" so then you had the audacity to pretend that you weren't talking about conservatives in general but a specific set of conservatives that you didn't even mention until I corrected you.
Now you're trying to use a 50 year study to prove your point yet I have to explain to you why it can't be used because the culture around the topic has drastically changed, and you even admit so to a degree but think because it would change in your favour we should just assume the prior one is accurate.
So in Summary:
- You accept my position that there has been a drastic change in the culture regarding the topic but you think outdated data can be used.
- You admit that the 2 year evaluation to refute my position doesn't actually include the problem my position is about.
- You abandoned your skirt analogy after my criticism of it.
- You somehow think that I consider your rhetoric well made even though I've been insulting you for it.
Like at what point do I take you seriously after these experiences with you, my dude?
--
S0UNDS_WEIRD
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Hold on. Whoa, whoa, whoa. Did you just admit you're a Q follower? This comes first for me.
--
[Old Memory]
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Whoa, whoa, whoa. Did you just imply that anybody that disagrees with you isn't a Q follower? Oooft. Now if you excuse me I have tea plans with Hitler and Satan.
--
S0UNDS_WEIRD
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yes. I disagree with rational people sometimes as well.
I'm just curious. Do you or do you not think there's some substance to be found in Q? If you do, why not just say it? There's nothing to be ashamed of if it's substantial after all.
And don't fucking lie to me like that again, young man; I _am_ Satan and Hitler is shuffling cards less than six feet away from me because we don't give a _fuck_ about social distancing in this bitch.
--
[Old Memory]
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Wow. Did you just imply Q Anon people can be rational? Wow.
I'm just curious why you think I haven't noticed you changing the subject and trying to compensate in this completely irrelevant topic, especially a disingenuous one because we both know that regardless of what I say you will still try to give the impression that I believe in Q Anon shit. Bait and switch, S.W, bait and switch. You're not nearly as intelligent as you think you are to subtly make such a play.
Ah, so you're telling me you play the cards Hitler deals you. I can believe it. Also, we live in a society.
--
S0UNDS_WEIRD
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
"Did you just imply Q Anon people can be rational?"
I feel like you meant "can't".
If so, 100%. I absolutely just implied that, at least that they can't while still a part of that. Perhaps they can break out later but they're currently mentally ill.
If you meant "can", no. I absolutely did not imply that.
No. If you fully denounce Q I will take your word for it, at least at this point.
"You're not nearly as intelligent as you think you are--"
Fuck. That's not good at all. I already don't even _think_ I'm very intelligent at all. In fact, I suspect humans in current form will never achieve our goal of unifying gravity with quantum mechanics because we simply aren't even close to sufficiently intelligent. Yet we speak of when it will finally happen. 100 years? 200 years? The thought that humans being the most intelligent species on the planet just happens to coincide with being sufficiently intelligent to fully mathematically understand the entire universe is one hell of a foolish assumption. I feel that chimps too likely believe they can understand everything with enough time. We aren't much further along.
All that expressed, with this new information from you I now feel like a self-aware ugly person just hearing that claim that we're all five times uglier than we think of our appearance in the mirror. Horrible news indeed.
I do at least feel perhaps slightly more intelligent than the average bear when debating regarding things like dark matter versus MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics) as the explanation for the apparent disparity between observed galactic mass and the actual gravitational behavior thereof, but that's because I have to push myself and it's really difficult material. I don't feel particularly challenged by things like determining the sum of two and two, whether or not it's hypocritical to act outraged at alleged trans victimizers only to make fun of trans people, and simply reading numbers on simple graphs.
That's more like a UFC champion beating up a little kid on the playground; there's something wrong with you if it's an ego boost, if things _that_ simple make you feel intelligent. Rather, unlike assaulting children, this is just something that socially has to be done, albeit begrudgingly.
No. I don't play cards that Hitler deals me; he's just the dealer in the casino I'm running in Hell. The house always wins.
--
[Old Memory]
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Marvellous.