Blame the media or blame the parents?

The Media's never had such a strong impact before. I was always bothered by commercials aimed towards children like those happy meal commercials. It's so easy to make something appealing to children, it doesn't seem fair.

Anyway, recently I had a conversation with a friend and we talked about how we were raised right compared to nowadays children. We went to bed at time, we played outside, she ate healthy. Except I didn't eat healthy. Growing up I remember having soda for breakfast and eating a lot of junkfood. My parents weren't bad parents but my family immigrated to the US and in the first few years there was a huge language barrier. It took awhile for them to realize just because something's advertised to a child doesn't mean they should have it. So in this case I blamed the media because I couldn't expect my parents to adapt to a new culture so quickly.

Parents with language barriers are still probably at a disadvantage when it comes to spotting trickery in the media. And even if they suffer more it's not like it's easy for them to voice their complaints.

Some parents are just bad parents, and there's no excuses. But, the kid didn't pick his/her parents so I guess they get to end up unhealthy too.

I'm not saying that you should blame all of a kid's faults on the media but I definitely think media should own up to some of the blame.

Parents' fault completely 15
Mostly the parents' fault 46
Split between the two 42
Mostly the media's fault? 15
Media's fault completely 13
Other 4
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 26 )
  • Megid

    I don't think it's fair to hold media accountable for human ignorance.

    If the parents don't know any better, it's because they were also the product of bad parenting.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • The fact is that we are lied to by the media every day. If we didn't have the media then our species would be a much more healthy and a much more active species. We used to be hunters but now we are shoppers, I don't call that evolution but the media does.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • dappled

    I don't understand why we'd willingly and knowingly accept being lied to about food, something incredibly important to our wellbeing.

    Imagine if you went to the pharmacy for some some painkillers and they gave you cyanide, telling you "You won't feel a thing ten seconds after you've taken one of these". There'd be outrage.

    Sure, food takes longer to kill you, but isn't it the same thing?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • TheGenie165

    Theres nothing the parents can do to stop kids from seeing the media in some way :(

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Shackleford96

    http://lora8.deviantart.com/art/LOVIN-IT-117247752

    ^ Guaranteed to make you laugh.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Angel_in_a_Glass_Dress

      lol funny.

      ever wonder though.... the clown is usually thin. you can't be thin if all you eat is McDonald's.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
    • YES!

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • SMILEifyourstupid

    75% the parents, 21% the media and 4% the kids

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Smartasscookie

    The media advertises so people will buy their products, it is down to the choice of the parent to decide whether they choose to buy that particular product or not, so I'd still mainly say it is down to the parent and if you don't want your child to be influenced by the media so much then don't let them sit in front of the TV for so long

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Tisgranum

    Split between the three: Media, parents, and the child him/her self.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • howaminotmyself

    The role of media is not to raise children. Therefore, it rarely takes children's needs into account. It has a different agenda. It really should come as no surprise that most of them only want profit and children are easy targets. They then test the parents ability to filter all the information flying at them. And they don't alwys like it when we actually use our brains.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Lynxikat

    The media can influence a child, but at the end of the day, it's the parent's responsibility to raise their child.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • MahBoi24

    It's the parents' fault completely. It's THEIR responsibility to raise THEIR children. It's not anyone else's responsibility. Parents today are just lazy, and looking for anything to blame for their own parental failure.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Mainly the parents but you can't get away from the media these days and it does have a bigger effect on young people. The way media is used these days is evil.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • alaskaforever

    Parents need to raise their children so that they know that the media is trying to sell something to them, and so that they can judge whether it is right or wrong.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • UliNalaMansae

    it depends! would you blame the parents for neglecting the child and having a tv babysit them whilst showing commercials and adverts of junk food and hollywood crap or would you blame the media for partly brain washing adults and therefore there children as well? seriously?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • mrsh

    I say it is the parents fault. A parent should know what is healthy for their child. I mean it is just so obvious that a big mac is not healthy! I think it's lazy of parents to feed their children junk food, get of your butt and prepare them healthy meals that make them strong and help them to make better choices when they are grown.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • joybird

    I don't know about elsewhere but in the UK they are not allowed to advertise junk food eg. McD, KFC, Pizzahut, etc before 9pm so that children aren't as aware of the places as they used to be. Can't remember seeing any ads for chocolate either before 9pm ... but can't swear to that.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • It's the same in Australia.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • dom180

    The media tells the parents what to do. The parents are foolish to do it, but I'd still blame the media, as well as the education system.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • It's the responsibility of the media to be unbiased, and not push propaganda (although that's almost always not the case). But it's also the parents' obligation to protect their child and decide what's best for them, whether that's the food they eat, the TV they watch, the people they hang out with, etc.

    Parents are ignorant to say Marilyn Manson made their kid violent because they saw aggressive imagery in his music video and interpreted it falsely, or that their child is clinically obese because they asked for McDonald's every day, due to seeing Ronald McDonald jumping around happily eating a Big Mac in an advertisement. That is just denial of responsibility. As long as parents have the ability to monitor their children's behavior and exposure towards such things, there should be no real problem.

    From age 18*, the child becomes a consenting adult; free and able to make their own decisions in life. Before that, it's up to the parents. Sure the media is distorted and manipulated, but if that's so, why don't they simply stop consenting their young ones to it?

    *Age laws vary from country to country.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Even you would admit that parenting would be easier if there was no Ronald McDonald?

      I think it's impossible to take the media out of anyone's life. So a parent can't simply keep their kids from kids from seeing Ronald McDonald. A majority of food ads aimed towards children are about junk food or fast food. And apparently an obese child gets 40% of his/her calorie count from snacks.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Riddler

        Blame the parents for not teaching the child right or wrong, not teaching them the difference between fact and fiction and not giving children any morals. Now if the child knows right from wrong and do it anyways that is on the child. Since that is just a very fucked up kid.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
      • That's why I said *both* are responsible. The media should be a source of unbiased, facts/information. That is what needs to change in the media, but I'm also saying parents can't put all the blame on advertisements, the news etc. For example with the obese kid, they were compliant in getting him all that fast food, so it is their fault too.

        I agree that profiteering is fucking everyone over, but so is ignorant parenting. It's kind of a joint operation.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • joybird

          Some parents actually believe they are being good to their children if they can afford to give them everything they want. Maybe coz they want to be their 'friends', or they grew up poor, or the parents are too young to parent, or it's easier to stop them whining, or they're not educated about MSG etc just like people didn't initially know that nicotine is addictive.

          Also if you are living in a country where obesity is quite normal, you will grow to that size too :o(

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • Yes, misinformation is a huge problem, and it's true the media is largely responsible for that.

            Comment Hidden ( show )