I know that and squeallikeasacofpigs said "under the age of 11"
you said to age 11
not under the age of 11
you don't get what im saying,
it didn't say nothing about the age under 11 years old in the line so i don't agree. this person said he/she is concerned about leaving kids under the age of 11 well of course who would do that
where talking about your story
now stop and rethink maybe you'll understand better i hope i think half have clogged memory's to.
As a child, how much of the time were you left unsupervised?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I know that and squeallikeasacofpigs said "under the age of 11"
you said to age 11
not under the age of 11
you don't get what im saying,
it didn't say nothing about the age under 11 years old in the line so i don't agree. this person said he/she is concerned about leaving kids under the age of 11 well of course who would do that
where talking about your story
now stop and rethink maybe you'll understand better i hope i think half have clogged memory's to.
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
To age 11 means under 11, dumbass.
--
cigs
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
O fucking k get mad because you don't get what your own self wrote twice. You wont understand so end of comment good bye.