What defines a "Marriage" should remain a personal arrangement not to be dictated by a government.
Obviously the legal implications eg. the rights of parties within a marriage/union should be the only thing the government should be looking after.
I find it ironic that most of the people who don't support Gay marriages are the ones who usually scream for minimised government intervention and individualism. Why can't this be applied to people marrying/unionising with same sex partners?
Are you supportive of gay people/gay marriage?
← View full post
What defines a "Marriage" should remain a personal arrangement not to be dictated by a government.
Obviously the legal implications eg. the rights of parties within a marriage/union should be the only thing the government should be looking after.
I find it ironic that most of the people who don't support Gay marriages are the ones who usually scream for minimised government intervention and individualism. Why can't this be applied to people marrying/unionising with same sex partners?
And for the record, I'm straight.