How do you figure that when access to abortion and birth control is actually getting worse and women still aren't allowed to register for Selective Service?
Family planning? By planning not to have a family? You don't have to have sex if you're afraid of having a kid. No birth control is 100% so why bother?
Are you a feminist? Why or why not?
← View full post
Not, because feminism is no longer needed in the first world.
--
wigz
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
How do you figure that when access to abortion and birth control is actually getting worse and women still aren't allowed to register for Selective Service?
--
Data
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Those are all related to optional parts of life in the first world. Taking the path of least resistance, none of that would be an issue.
--
wigz
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
No, part of being first world is family planning. You lose that status when you force women to bear pregnancy.
--
[Old Memory]
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
Data
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
We're not forcing women to bear pregnancy over here, because we're not forcing them into marriages, and thereby marital rape and pregnancy.
It's a woman's own choice to have sex, and any otherwise, we throw the rapist in jail.
No one else is responsible for giving a woman birth control when she has the option of abstinence. No sex, no baby, and no need for contraception.
I'm of the opinion that having sex is a privilege, not a right.
Family planning? By planning not to have a family? You don't have to have sex if you're afraid of having a kid. No birth control is 100% so why bother?