Are women more evolved biologically than men?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

↑ View this comment's parent

← View full post
Comments ( 4 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • No, I have no idea what you're asking. Your question is logically faulty and is unanswerable. I politely ask you, if you really want to get a satisfying understanding of evolution in general, to read a few chapters of an online textbook, or watch a few university lecture videos, and that will help immensely.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Essentially, why do human females have these traits (outlined in OP)? They are either EXTREMELY rare or non-existant in any other animals and serve no biological purpose. Human males however do not possess any mysterious or biologically insignificant traits. Everything about the male body is logically explained and/or biologically relevant but the same is not true for the human female. Human females have less in common with other animals than males do, in terms of simple biology (reproduction, appearance), that are non-essential or unexplained. And why haven't human males developed a defense for hidden ovulation yet?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • I'm not talking to you until you read up.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
      • "Human males however do not possess any mysterious or biologically insignificant traits..."

        Why do males have nipples? They do not breastfeed or have any use of them. While the reason is not so mysterious, man nipples do happen to be pretty insignificant.

        Comment Hidden ( show )