there is no need for prominent breasts-- by the same logic you could say there is no need for nipples on men.
the clitoris is the only organ solely for sexual pleasure--
not so. the glans of the penis is solely for sexual pleasure. Sure, it's part of the penis, but is irrelevant for the sake of the argument. Point is, BOTH male and female have a part of their genitals that is made of nerves and seems to be just for pleasure. A penis could still function without the glans
female orgasm is not as crucially needed but is still beneficial toward pregnancy. human (both male and female) orgasm has evolved greatly. sure male orgasm is necessary but it doesn't have to be as pleasurable as it is--our sensory have caught up to our brains to incorporate different elements to sex other than just physical--for both male and female. This helps bonding, both with our mates and with our children, which further helps survival success.
That is incorrect sorry. The glans are necessary to absorb force during intercourse. The structure of the erect penis would be more frequently damaged with their removal. Glans are softer than the engorged structure below for this reason.
No, as male nipples are there because of how we develop in the womb. There's a biological explanation for this while there is NOT an explanation for prominent breast and "full time" prominent breast is only seen in humans, not other mammals.
I didn't say the clitoris is the only organ for sexual pleasure. I said it's the only organ whose sole purpose is pleasure. There's no biological need for female orgasm. It is a myth that it aids in conception. This was a theory that has been disproven.
It could also be argued that male nipples serve solely for pleasure. And conversely, there is at least a little truth in the claim that the clitoris is just a "leftover" from penis development. Also, I know you didn't explicitly say they were, but humans are not the only species to have them.
Yeah but male nipples/breast are significantly "underdeveloped" in comparison to females due to it being a leftover but the clitoris isn't really. It's really large and complex.
Are women more evolved biologically than men?
← View full post
there is no need for prominent breasts-- by the same logic you could say there is no need for nipples on men.
the clitoris is the only organ solely for sexual pleasure--
not so. the glans of the penis is solely for sexual pleasure. Sure, it's part of the penis, but is irrelevant for the sake of the argument. Point is, BOTH male and female have a part of their genitals that is made of nerves and seems to be just for pleasure. A penis could still function without the glans
female orgasm is not as crucially needed but is still beneficial toward pregnancy. human (both male and female) orgasm has evolved greatly. sure male orgasm is necessary but it doesn't have to be as pleasurable as it is--our sensory have caught up to our brains to incorporate different elements to sex other than just physical--for both male and female. This helps bonding, both with our mates and with our children, which further helps survival success.
--
SuperBenzid
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
Anonymous Post Author
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
That is incorrect sorry. The glans are necessary to absorb force during intercourse. The structure of the erect penis would be more frequently damaged with their removal. Glans are softer than the engorged structure below for this reason.
No, as male nipples are there because of how we develop in the womb. There's a biological explanation for this while there is NOT an explanation for prominent breast and "full time" prominent breast is only seen in humans, not other mammals.
I didn't say the clitoris is the only organ for sexual pleasure. I said it's the only organ whose sole purpose is pleasure. There's no biological need for female orgasm. It is a myth that it aids in conception. This was a theory that has been disproven.
--
Couman
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It could also be argued that male nipples serve solely for pleasure. And conversely, there is at least a little truth in the claim that the clitoris is just a "leftover" from penis development. Also, I know you didn't explicitly say they were, but humans are not the only species to have them.
--
Anonymous Post Author
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yeah but male nipples/breast are significantly "underdeveloped" in comparison to females due to it being a leftover but the clitoris isn't really. It's really large and complex.