Restricting firearms only restricts those who purchase legally.
Look at DC. They had a complete ban on owning handguns... and the highest rate of gun-related crime. Why? Because criminals had them, and the law-abiding citizens did not.
That is true, but my point was that whether increased firearms regulations will or will not work to diminish violence is moot, as I personally will simply refuse to give up my weapons.
Are my political stances normal?
← View full post
FIREARMS REGULATIONS:
Restricting firearms only restricts those who purchase legally.
Look at DC. They had a complete ban on owning handguns... and the highest rate of gun-related crime. Why? Because criminals had them, and the law-abiding citizens did not.
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
That is true, but my point was that whether increased firearms regulations will or will not work to diminish violence is moot, as I personally will simply refuse to give up my weapons.
--
ashfordite
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Angel_in_a_Glass_Dress
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
There is not enough evidence to tell for certain but you reason like a sociopath
i would not want to give up mine either.
and i say anyone who wants to take them away is against the constitution which gives us the right to have them.
and therefore they should go form their own country and leave ours the hell alone =)