It's not the fact that women can never do a man's job, it's the fact that most women can't. There are definetly isolated cases in which women do better than a lot of men in a man's job, but that is only one isolated case. ANd like you said, almost every guy, not every guy, so there were a few still better than her. I would like to know if she had more training than the others, though, because that is a biggy.
I still believe men are better due to the fact that without man's inventions, women wouldn't be able to do nearly as much work or hardship as men do because they can't rely on technology to do a lot of the work.
Kind of like how women had to take over work in society when the men went to war. They done enough to make society run by, but they still weren't able to do the ammount men done at the same job due to lack of technology and more hard work from the individuals needed.
The difference between the male and female contribution is that female contribution in intelligence is them learning what is already learned to keep society running the way it is, not challenging the already known facts, where as male intelligence is that including challenging the known fact, expanding the facts, and instead of just working towards keeping society how it is, their intelligence is towards changing society instead of keeping it as it is; progressing it.
I don't believe women can do anything a man can do. Yes, roofing is hard work, and I respect that one woman for challenging herself and doing amazingly in a man's work area, but one single incident does not equal to the whole gender being able to do the same. For example, I don't believe women would be able to cope with doing the whole mining workforce area, in which you have to dig down, shaking hands with the devil, knowing that there is a chance everything can cave in on you at any time.
I personally am a bit skeptical about that woman working there doing great. I don't know if she was doing the same type of work as the other males or doing the lesser part of the job that needed done but was still easier, and/or if she was getting more help, and the physical effort if she needed help aswell. Although, I was not there, so I can't exactly challenge it, just state that I am a bit iffy that I can't get all the details and full truth.
I have to agree with the last part, we do develop how we are treated due to the enviroment. Feminist said that "women don't do better than men in maths and science because they are told they aren't as good at those things (enviroment)", regardless of their being a science study that shows they are better at those things due to having more gray matter that maths and science would be improved with in the brain. Regardless of that, I will get back on point. Males are constantly shown on mainstream media and on the internet that they aren't as good at women at education, they do worse in tests, less males finnish school, more males drop out, males are criminals, and so on. If enviroment is something that effects humans in that manner, which I agree it does, it shows that males are more so the victims of enviroment than females are. For example, it is acceptable to say things like "women are better at college than males", yet a teacher was fired for saying men are better at math (which is a fact due to more gray matter being in the male brain", regardless of that, he was fired, while people are allowed to claim females being better at education, which if gives the enviroment as "women are better feel" which would end up effecting male performance.
Are men better than women or is it the other way 'round?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
It's not the fact that women can never do a man's job, it's the fact that most women can't. There are definetly isolated cases in which women do better than a lot of men in a man's job, but that is only one isolated case. ANd like you said, almost every guy, not every guy, so there were a few still better than her. I would like to know if she had more training than the others, though, because that is a biggy.
I still believe men are better due to the fact that without man's inventions, women wouldn't be able to do nearly as much work or hardship as men do because they can't rely on technology to do a lot of the work.
Kind of like how women had to take over work in society when the men went to war. They done enough to make society run by, but they still weren't able to do the ammount men done at the same job due to lack of technology and more hard work from the individuals needed.
The difference between the male and female contribution is that female contribution in intelligence is them learning what is already learned to keep society running the way it is, not challenging the already known facts, where as male intelligence is that including challenging the known fact, expanding the facts, and instead of just working towards keeping society how it is, their intelligence is towards changing society instead of keeping it as it is; progressing it.
I don't believe women can do anything a man can do. Yes, roofing is hard work, and I respect that one woman for challenging herself and doing amazingly in a man's work area, but one single incident does not equal to the whole gender being able to do the same. For example, I don't believe women would be able to cope with doing the whole mining workforce area, in which you have to dig down, shaking hands with the devil, knowing that there is a chance everything can cave in on you at any time.
I personally am a bit skeptical about that woman working there doing great. I don't know if she was doing the same type of work as the other males or doing the lesser part of the job that needed done but was still easier, and/or if she was getting more help, and the physical effort if she needed help aswell. Although, I was not there, so I can't exactly challenge it, just state that I am a bit iffy that I can't get all the details and full truth.
I have to agree with the last part, we do develop how we are treated due to the enviroment. Feminist said that "women don't do better than men in maths and science because they are told they aren't as good at those things (enviroment)", regardless of their being a science study that shows they are better at those things due to having more gray matter that maths and science would be improved with in the brain. Regardless of that, I will get back on point. Males are constantly shown on mainstream media and on the internet that they aren't as good at women at education, they do worse in tests, less males finnish school, more males drop out, males are criminals, and so on. If enviroment is something that effects humans in that manner, which I agree it does, it shows that males are more so the victims of enviroment than females are. For example, it is acceptable to say things like "women are better at college than males", yet a teacher was fired for saying men are better at math (which is a fact due to more gray matter being in the male brain", regardless of that, he was fired, while people are allowed to claim females being better at education, which if gives the enviroment as "women are better feel" which would end up effecting male performance.