Interesting article if not a bit harsh. I hadn't an idea of what onanist meant, but I went ahead and checked it up. Of the basest of terms for it... Yes, yes I am as it was stated in the initial comment.
One thing I'm half-wondering is this normal to have the initial attraction to anyone I am introduced to, fall out of that state and not only not imagine myself sexual with some, but not imagine real persons in fantasies. Any fantasies are strictly with imagined characters, some recurring some not as I have never really read of such occurrences.
Or... Is it simply a case of me being not 'finding someone(s)'?
Also: In the case of the article I do consider myself a 'pansexual' due to the idea of me rather enjoying the idea of someone I connect with an I wouldn't mind what they are. The reason why I use 'pan' than 'bi' as argued by the article if we end up finding aliens or intelligent beings I am able to communcate with that are non-human... Why the heck would I restrict myself for the chance of a connection.
And I think this also is one of the oddities of myself, due to my lack of overt sexual desire as seems normal for others, I am open to the idea of non-sexual people as well, perhaps why fantasies that DO involve myself, don't involve actual sex and involve a 'masked' presence of whom I'm with.
Am I considered Asexual, Pansexual or Something else?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Interesting article if not a bit harsh. I hadn't an idea of what onanist meant, but I went ahead and checked it up. Of the basest of terms for it... Yes, yes I am as it was stated in the initial comment.
One thing I'm half-wondering is this normal to have the initial attraction to anyone I am introduced to, fall out of that state and not only not imagine myself sexual with some, but not imagine real persons in fantasies. Any fantasies are strictly with imagined characters, some recurring some not as I have never really read of such occurrences.
Or... Is it simply a case of me being not 'finding someone(s)'?
Also: In the case of the article I do consider myself a 'pansexual' due to the idea of me rather enjoying the idea of someone I connect with an I wouldn't mind what they are. The reason why I use 'pan' than 'bi' as argued by the article if we end up finding aliens or intelligent beings I am able to communcate with that are non-human... Why the heck would I restrict myself for the chance of a connection.
And I think this also is one of the oddities of myself, due to my lack of overt sexual desire as seems normal for others, I am open to the idea of non-sexual people as well, perhaps why fantasies that DO involve myself, don't involve actual sex and involve a 'masked' presence of whom I'm with.