Your assumption of him being a sex addict has no grounds. He can count how many times he's had sex in half a year on one hand. There is nothing to suggest you're an addict if you want a little more than that. Furthermore he did state there was a point in time when she wanted it more than he could keep up with. And while we're at it, lets not assume she's non the wiser of what's been going on for a year and a half. *That* would be taking sides.
The OP literally says "I got addicted very quickly". I'm basing it on that, and it makes the entire rest of the post actually make sense (for a start, why would the OP continue paying her for sex for months, without even getting the sex, if the OP weren't an addict? That doesn't sound like the actions of someone of sound mind.).
Well don't you worry, because I'm not assuming she's non-the-wiser. I made it extremely clear I wasn't making a judgement, and gave lip service to both the possibility of her guilt and the possibility of her innocence. Why wasn't that satisfactory to you? Was it my refusal to condemn her as a gold digging slut (even though there's no evidence for it whatsoever and we've not heard her side)?
Am I being an ass, or is she?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Your assumption of him being a sex addict has no grounds. He can count how many times he's had sex in half a year on one hand. There is nothing to suggest you're an addict if you want a little more than that. Furthermore he did state there was a point in time when she wanted it more than he could keep up with. And while we're at it, lets not assume she's non the wiser of what's been going on for a year and a half. *That* would be taking sides.
--
dom180
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
The OP literally says "I got addicted very quickly". I'm basing it on that, and it makes the entire rest of the post actually make sense (for a start, why would the OP continue paying her for sex for months, without even getting the sex, if the OP weren't an addict? That doesn't sound like the actions of someone of sound mind.).
Well don't you worry, because I'm not assuming she's non-the-wiser. I made it extremely clear I wasn't making a judgement, and gave lip service to both the possibility of her guilt and the possibility of her innocence. Why wasn't that satisfactory to you? Was it my refusal to condemn her as a gold digging slut (even though there's no evidence for it whatsoever and we've not heard her side)?