No one agrees with me? Speak for yourself, not others. There are plenty that agree with me, and I'll name three of the more known ones. NeuroNeptunian, CoverYourEars, and Lulz. Don't say nobody agrees with me just to make yourself feel like everyone is agreeing with you, and not agreeing with me, because there are plenty that agree with me, and plenty that dissagree with you all together.
I knew it, I knew I would regret replying to you. You've said this all before in a debate with me that took three days, that I won (other users words, not mine).
Remember this marvelous line that you kept trying to avoid?
"We are already paying for other peoples kids, child support comes out of the taxpayers pockets".
I then followed up with the idea - So we don't give the money we use for child support to pay for kids that aren't ours, and give it to everybody to be able to have financial abortion, that means the "taxpayers" benefit from paying their taxes, not a parent and their kid that the taxpayers have no connection to. This way instead of paying for the kids that aren't ours from taxes, the taxpayers money is given to the kids thats parents claimed financial abortion.
Exchanging childsupport for financial abortion taxes, which the taxpayers would be happier doing, since "they" actually benefit from "their" taxes.
I have adressed that before plenty of times, it was you that avoided my answer when I gave it, and ignored it when I repeated it constantly.
So by not getting the taxpayers money spent on child support, the taxpayers money goes to helping financial abortion, that way the taxpayers actually benefit from getting their taxes spent on child support, to children that aren't theirs.
Not replying to you at all after this. I could of been reasonable in discussing this more with you, but you've done exactly what I knew you would do, you are repeating everying "exactly" the way you did back then. I proved you wrong on the matter then, most of the time you just kept repeating yourself because you "refused" to even acknowledge my taxpayers point, and I am not going on a three day debate with you again that could of been finnished in twenty minutes if you actually acknoweledged the points I made instead of intentionally ignoring it.
Even in your next reply, you will say a little bit about the actual taxpayers point I made here, and back in the older debate, then max the whole comment box out on a completely different matter.
No one agrees with you?? OK, well apparently ALL of society agrees with me, so that's hardly no one. Like I said, talk to a lawyer. But you won't....You're too much of a pussy.
Am I a bad person for being pro-choice?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
No one agrees with me? Speak for yourself, not others. There are plenty that agree with me, and I'll name three of the more known ones. NeuroNeptunian, CoverYourEars, and Lulz. Don't say nobody agrees with me just to make yourself feel like everyone is agreeing with you, and not agreeing with me, because there are plenty that agree with me, and plenty that dissagree with you all together.
I knew it, I knew I would regret replying to you. You've said this all before in a debate with me that took three days, that I won (other users words, not mine).
Remember this marvelous line that you kept trying to avoid?
"We are already paying for other peoples kids, child support comes out of the taxpayers pockets".
I then followed up with the idea - So we don't give the money we use for child support to pay for kids that aren't ours, and give it to everybody to be able to have financial abortion, that means the "taxpayers" benefit from paying their taxes, not a parent and their kid that the taxpayers have no connection to. This way instead of paying for the kids that aren't ours from taxes, the taxpayers money is given to the kids thats parents claimed financial abortion.
Exchanging childsupport for financial abortion taxes, which the taxpayers would be happier doing, since "they" actually benefit from "their" taxes.
I have adressed that before plenty of times, it was you that avoided my answer when I gave it, and ignored it when I repeated it constantly.
So by not getting the taxpayers money spent on child support, the taxpayers money goes to helping financial abortion, that way the taxpayers actually benefit from getting their taxes spent on child support, to children that aren't theirs.
Not replying to you at all after this. I could of been reasonable in discussing this more with you, but you've done exactly what I knew you would do, you are repeating everying "exactly" the way you did back then. I proved you wrong on the matter then, most of the time you just kept repeating yourself because you "refused" to even acknowledge my taxpayers point, and I am not going on a three day debate with you again that could of been finnished in twenty minutes if you actually acknoweledged the points I made instead of intentionally ignoring it.
Even in your next reply, you will say a little bit about the actual taxpayers point I made here, and back in the older debate, then max the whole comment box out on a completely different matter.
--
wigsplitz
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No one agrees with you?? OK, well apparently ALL of society agrees with me, so that's hardly no one. Like I said, talk to a lawyer. But you won't....You're too much of a pussy.