Physically, and it's their choice to go through it. They have the option of not having sex, birth control, abortion, adoption. They have safety nets for "after" they fall pregnant, where as males don't have the option at all to choose if they want to be a father or not.
How does financial abortion take away any rights for the woman to have or abort her child?
So because females deal with the most during reproduction, that means the male doesn't get a choice on if he'll be allowed to not have to take parental responsibility or not, but the female does simply because she has to go through the pregnancy?
Well, how about the military and most jobs in society? Most males die from their services due to them doing most of the dangerous jobs and being put in the most dangerous situations, men fought the wars and suffered most from wars to keep their countries from being invanded, and more males today are put in more dangerous areas in the military and suffer the most than women.
If it's a case of "one party suffers the most, so the others shouldn't be given the same choice, then females shouldn't be allowed to do nearly as much the male gender does due to them taking "most" of the pain and suffering to defend and keep society going? Same logic.
Now I don't agree with that (to say I do would be to say I believe what you said is right), but that is the same logic process as your reply to me is.
(Being respectful, I would appreciate it if you were too and gave your opinions that differ from mine in a calm manner like I'm giving you).
Or perhaps they gave you a thumb down just because they honestly disagreed with you. It's normal for you to believe that your opinions are correct, but that doesn't meant that everyone else is illogical, over-emotional, and boring. They have a right to their opinions as much as you have a right to yours.
Yes, and to prove they're not just thumbing the comment down because they heard something they didn't want to hear that proves them wrong, they should explain why they dissagree.
Maybe they didn't want to. Maybe they've already argued with you on another poll, and didn't want to take the time to restate all their opinions. I don't mean this is a bad way, but you do tend to repeat yourself in your comments. Regardless, your sudden defensiveness was uncalled for, and probably the reason you're often seen as condescending on this site.
I only repeat myself when it is on a different matter, when someone has ignored it in the first place, or if someone is saying the same thing in which my original post was put on, in which I repeat myself to what they have repeated.
I'm not being defensive, just stating a point.
I see what you mean in regards to the first bit- repetition is often neccesary. But someone gave you a thumb down, and you immediately start accusing the whole community of being over-emotional, etc. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that sounds pretty insecure.
The fact that every law and society in existence opposes what you propose is proof enough of why you're wrong and an idiot. if only YOU could see that.
Am I a bad person for being pro-choice?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Physically, and it's their choice to go through it. They have the option of not having sex, birth control, abortion, adoption. They have safety nets for "after" they fall pregnant, where as males don't have the option at all to choose if they want to be a father or not.
How does financial abortion take away any rights for the woman to have or abort her child?
So because females deal with the most during reproduction, that means the male doesn't get a choice on if he'll be allowed to not have to take parental responsibility or not, but the female does simply because she has to go through the pregnancy?
Well, how about the military and most jobs in society? Most males die from their services due to them doing most of the dangerous jobs and being put in the most dangerous situations, men fought the wars and suffered most from wars to keep their countries from being invanded, and more males today are put in more dangerous areas in the military and suffer the most than women.
If it's a case of "one party suffers the most, so the others shouldn't be given the same choice, then females shouldn't be allowed to do nearly as much the male gender does due to them taking "most" of the pain and suffering to defend and keep society going? Same logic.
Now I don't agree with that (to say I do would be to say I believe what you said is right), but that is the same logic process as your reply to me is.
(Being respectful, I would appreciate it if you were too and gave your opinions that differ from mine in a calm manner like I'm giving you).
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
A thumbs down, yet no actual points to explain why I'm at all wrong...Typical.
I hope most people on IIN don't have a role in law. "You make sense, but I don't like you, so I'll dissagree with you anyway".
-Yawn- IsItNormal community, you're becoming illogical, over emotional, and boring.
--
nAt2017
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
-
wigsplitz
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Or perhaps they gave you a thumb down just because they honestly disagreed with you. It's normal for you to believe that your opinions are correct, but that doesn't meant that everyone else is illogical, over-emotional, and boring. They have a right to their opinions as much as you have a right to yours.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yes, and to prove they're not just thumbing the comment down because they heard something they didn't want to hear that proves them wrong, they should explain why they dissagree.
--
nAt2017
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Maybe they didn't want to. Maybe they've already argued with you on another poll, and didn't want to take the time to restate all their opinions. I don't mean this is a bad way, but you do tend to repeat yourself in your comments. Regardless, your sudden defensiveness was uncalled for, and probably the reason you're often seen as condescending on this site.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I only repeat myself when it is on a different matter, when someone has ignored it in the first place, or if someone is saying the same thing in which my original post was put on, in which I repeat myself to what they have repeated.
I'm not being defensive, just stating a point.
--
nAt2017
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
I see what you mean in regards to the first bit- repetition is often neccesary. But someone gave you a thumb down, and you immediately start accusing the whole community of being over-emotional, etc. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that sounds pretty insecure.
The fact that every law and society in existence opposes what you propose is proof enough of why you're wrong and an idiot. if only YOU could see that.