I am becoming quite annoyed with you!
You are wasting my time (and everyone else's), because you refuse to listen, and I need to continuously repeat myself, because it is YOU, who continuously try to LEAD everyone.
Now, please listen up. I hope this will be for the last time.
I do not have any ambitions to 'lead' anyone. I do not seek fame, fortune or control.
Please cease and desist from trying to LEAD other people into false beliefs of my intentions.
Incorrect.
"Nature", does not have any "human rights".
I will prove this to you.
If you were face-to-face with a very angry Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos horribilis), you are unarmed, and have no place to climb to safety, you can't outfight the bear, you can't outrun the bear and you can't reason with the bear. Nature says, you have a right to die.
Or, if you were standing out in the open, during a thunderstorm, in the exact location where a thunderbolt of lightning is ready to discharge, nature says that there is a very good chance that you have a right to die.
I will not respond to your last part.
I have already asked, repeatedly, to express yourself in a different manner, without the use of -ists and -isms (those suffixes derived from the Greek istēs or ismos).
No 9. It was a follow-up to the first one. There were two agenda 21 comments. The second was more detailed. Beep, warning john spartan, ten demerits for not responding in a timely fashion.
You have some of the same ideas the global tyrants have... Using bikes instead of vehicles... How ridiculous! Do you also favor living in a cell, I mean small apartment 9?
Incorrect.
I do not have all those same ideas.
I recognize that we will have vehicles for quite some time. It will take quite a bit of time to transform to a better, more efficient transportation system.
Bicycles, although useful in some areas, are usually not very practical in poor weather conditions and for handling cargo.
I favour simple ideas, which everyone can readily understand. Things like, live closer to where you work / study, or conversely, work / study closer to where you live. Community work centres could be a good idea for many, who don't need to commute to a far away office every day, but can do their work there, instead.
We can also do far better at handling cargo by rail, instead of by semi-tractor-trailer. Rail is by far, more efficient.
All these kinds of things will save huge amounts of time, energy and resources.
No. I've stated this before. I believe that we (not all, but some) people should live in togetherments. This new style of Architecture, could easily be built, where 4 to 12 domiciles share a single kitchen / dining area and other areas such as laundry and recreation, and possibly other uses. This would then be considered to be semi-private. There would be an adjoining private area for each domicile, with a private entrance.
Almost no one understands science and technology. It is dangerous...
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I am becoming quite annoyed with you!
You are wasting my time (and everyone else's), because you refuse to listen, and I need to continuously repeat myself, because it is YOU, who continuously try to LEAD everyone.
Now, please listen up. I hope this will be for the last time.
I do not have any ambitions to 'lead' anyone. I do not seek fame, fortune or control.
Please cease and desist from trying to LEAD other people into false beliefs of my intentions.
Have you got this straight in your head now?
--
MissyLeyneous
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You are such a motherfucking LIAR!! And a motherfucking HYPOCRITE!!
Incorrect.
"Nature", does not have any "human rights".
I will prove this to you.
If you were face-to-face with a very angry Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos horribilis), you are unarmed, and have no place to climb to safety, you can't outfight the bear, you can't outrun the bear and you can't reason with the bear. Nature says, you have a right to die.
Or, if you were standing out in the open, during a thunderstorm, in the exact location where a thunderbolt of lightning is ready to discharge, nature says that there is a very good chance that you have a right to die.
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I will not respond to your last part.
I have already asked, repeatedly, to express yourself in a different manner, without the use of -ists and -isms (those suffixes derived from the Greek istēs or ismos).
--
robbieforgotpw
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
9, here are ten demerits for boring everyone to death. Please try to be less machine like and more human.
You have not responded to the insightful info I provided concerning the globalists plans in agenda 21. It's in another post.
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I did respond to that.
Please do not use -ists and -isms.
--
robbieforgotpw
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No 9. It was a follow-up to the first one. There were two agenda 21 comments. The second was more detailed. Beep, warning john spartan, ten demerits for not responding in a timely fashion.
You have some of the same ideas the global tyrants have... Using bikes instead of vehicles... How ridiculous! Do you also favor living in a cell, I mean small apartment 9?
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Incorrect.
I do not have all those same ideas.
I recognize that we will have vehicles for quite some time. It will take quite a bit of time to transform to a better, more efficient transportation system.
Bicycles, although useful in some areas, are usually not very practical in poor weather conditions and for handling cargo.
I favour simple ideas, which everyone can readily understand. Things like, live closer to where you work / study, or conversely, work / study closer to where you live. Community work centres could be a good idea for many, who don't need to commute to a far away office every day, but can do their work there, instead.
We can also do far better at handling cargo by rail, instead of by semi-tractor-trailer. Rail is by far, more efficient.
All these kinds of things will save huge amounts of time, energy and resources.
No. I've stated this before. I believe that we (not all, but some) people should live in togetherments. This new style of Architecture, could easily be built, where 4 to 12 domiciles share a single kitchen / dining area and other areas such as laundry and recreation, and possibly other uses. This would then be considered to be semi-private. There would be an adjoining private area for each domicile, with a private entrance.