So you think murderers and rapists shouldn't be euthanized?
You're lumping all mental illnesses together.. l'm talking about real narcissists and sociopaths where lack of empathy and conscience is the disorder.. and it's already proven most of them don't think anything is wrong with them thus not seeking help and getting diagnosed and added to statistics. And those that are aware of their evil just don't give a shit and keep doing what they do.. you don't think they should be stopped?..
l say euthanize cause they are a danger to others and the world would be safer and better without them[narcs and socios].. i say not condemn like calling them demons and monsters who deserve to die a slow and painful death and understand scientifically that it's not they're fault they are prisoners to a very dysfunctional brain.. so yeah, "euthanized" and "understood and not condemned" can belong in the same sentence..
of course.. i'm talking about the low functioning really dangerous types.. a lot of them aren't violent killers but they always most certainly do harm people even just emotionally through neglect, abuse, manipulation etc.. actually even high functioning ones like world leaders who cause millions of people to suffer for their own selfishness and ego should be euthanized.
Not really, ending one life that causes the death and suffering of many is the moral thing to do. That's why l said euthanize.. it's fast and painless.
All evil people are mentally ill
← View full post
So you think murderers and rapists shouldn't be euthanized?
You're lumping all mental illnesses together.. l'm talking about real narcissists and sociopaths where lack of empathy and conscience is the disorder.. and it's already proven most of them don't think anything is wrong with them thus not seeking help and getting diagnosed and added to statistics. And those that are aware of their evil just don't give a shit and keep doing what they do.. you don't think they should be stopped?..
l say euthanize cause they are a danger to others and the world would be safer and better without them[narcs and socios].. i say not condemn like calling them demons and monsters who deserve to die a slow and painful death and understand scientifically that it's not they're fault they are prisoners to a very dysfunctional brain.. so yeah, "euthanized" and "understood and not condemned" can belong in the same sentence..
--
paramore93
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Faceless
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You know many 'narcs' and 'socios' live perfectly normal lives they're not all violent killers xD
--
Anonymous Post Author
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
of course.. i'm talking about the low functioning really dangerous types.. a lot of them aren't violent killers but they always most certainly do harm people even just emotionally through neglect, abuse, manipulation etc.. actually even high functioning ones like world leaders who cause millions of people to suffer for their own selfishness and ego should be euthanized.
--
paramore93
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
You know killing these people would make you just as bad as them though ..
--
Anonymous Post Author
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Not really, ending one life that causes the death and suffering of many is the moral thing to do. That's why l said euthanize.. it's fast and painless.
you commentated on your own post idiot.