This site is compelling and yet shit. The problem is that they've left approval of posts to a bunch of self-righteous fuckwits, who only approve a very narrow range of posts. Most of my posts, which are far more interesting and thought-provoking than most of the banal tripe you get on here, never get approved. Probably the same for others who could inject some colour into the site. So instead the site ends up full of idiots who think they might be gay because of some stray thought or trolls who can only try and shock with incest because no other interesting topics get approved. On top of that, there's a serious dearth of intellect here. Solution: get rid of the wankers currently approving posts.
Being a 4-year IIN veteran, I have seen that sometimes interesting and thought-provoking comments that provide insightful implications beyond the scope of the post can gather a following. If your comments themselves inject colourful commentary, Mensa level users come out of the woodwork to respond with a lively repartee that mostly everyone enjoys.
Banal comments about sister-fucking are still interjected, but what-the-fuck? The world ain't perfect.
That's reassuring. I'd gladly wax intellectual with the right crowd. You seem to have a brain. Why not stick around and keep the average IQ in triple digits?
I have actually persisted and had limited success keeping some of the discussions up at the two sigma level. But after long last, I am still confronted by my own jaded failure to find liberation in the free expression of id-centric perversions. Did Mr. Hyde cleanse Dr. Jekyll's mind to pursue noble enlightened pursuits? Arguably, I would say the answer is, "No".
I have an entire collection of user names that I refer to as "The Consortium". It is all under the umbrella of a playwright's license for theatrical drama. However, many long time IINers affectionately refer to me as "Boogers".
I've been signed up for a few years, but there was a long hiatus between my two main periods of activity. Hence I'm not overly familiar with users here (though there are some retards who are still around).
After 4 long years, I think I am finally tiring of IIN. Is this normal
← View full post
This site is compelling and yet shit. The problem is that they've left approval of posts to a bunch of self-righteous fuckwits, who only approve a very narrow range of posts. Most of my posts, which are far more interesting and thought-provoking than most of the banal tripe you get on here, never get approved. Probably the same for others who could inject some colour into the site. So instead the site ends up full of idiots who think they might be gay because of some stray thought or trolls who can only try and shock with incest because no other interesting topics get approved. On top of that, there's a serious dearth of intellect here. Solution: get rid of the wankers currently approving posts.
--
[Old Memory]
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
6
6
-
Anonymous Post Author
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-4
-4
"Most of my posts, which are far more interesting and thought-provoking than most of the banal tripe you get on here, never get approved."
Let me guess: Most of your posts are about wanting to fuck children?
Being a 4-year IIN veteran, I have seen that sometimes interesting and thought-provoking comments that provide insightful implications beyond the scope of the post can gather a following. If your comments themselves inject colourful commentary, Mensa level users come out of the woodwork to respond with a lively repartee that mostly everyone enjoys.
Banal comments about sister-fucking are still interjected, but what-the-fuck? The world ain't perfect.
--
johnpartridge
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-4
-4
That's reassuring. I'd gladly wax intellectual with the right crowd. You seem to have a brain. Why not stick around and keep the average IQ in triple digits?
--
Anonymous Post Author
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-4
-4
I have actually persisted and had limited success keeping some of the discussions up at the two sigma level. But after long last, I am still confronted by my own jaded failure to find liberation in the free expression of id-centric perversions. Did Mr. Hyde cleanse Dr. Jekyll's mind to pursue noble enlightened pursuits? Arguably, I would say the answer is, "No".
--
johnpartridge
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-4
-4
Well, if you were after a Mephistopheles figure who has a penchant for challenging prevalent doxa, stick around. What's your username?
--
Anonymous Post Author
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-4
-4
I have an entire collection of user names that I refer to as "The Consortium". It is all under the umbrella of a playwright's license for theatrical drama. However, many long time IINers affectionately refer to me as "Boogers".
--
charli.m
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
See More Comments =>
-
johnpartridge
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-4
-4
See More Comments =>
Affection? Who exactly do you assume likes you?
I've been signed up for a few years, but there was a long hiatus between my two main periods of activity. Hence I'm not overly familiar with users here (though there are some retards who are still around).