We're talking about someone's life here and in the moment a defenseless unborn child.
In almost no other case can another person claim termination on someone else.
Only in rare cases where there's something tragically wrong with the other person or that person was deemed extremely harmful and unfit for society does termination of another acceptably happen.
So what if person grows inside a woman? That doesn't mean much.
Shouldn't give her the right to kill it at will.
If she didn't want it she should of been smart enough to not get pregnant.
Imagine some female that loves to kill babies so she gets pregnant on purpose then before giving birth she kills it intentionally and keeps doing it.
So this woman can grow it in her stomach for 8 months then kill it or let someone else kill it for her and keep doing that?
By what you wrote you're completely fine with that.
I think that's short sighted and nuts.
By your thinking why limit the termination before she gives birth?
Why not allow the mother to kill her child anytime she wants at any age?
She grew it in her stomach. She presumably fed it, raised it, took care of it.
Why not let her or the father kill their own children at will?
Have you ever had a pet that you raised in your own home?
Do you think that gives you the right to kill it anytime you want?
Abortion: Men's take.
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I disagree.
We're talking about someone's life here and in the moment a defenseless unborn child.
In almost no other case can another person claim termination on someone else.
Only in rare cases where there's something tragically wrong with the other person or that person was deemed extremely harmful and unfit for society does termination of another acceptably happen.
So what if person grows inside a woman? That doesn't mean much.
Shouldn't give her the right to kill it at will.
If she didn't want it she should of been smart enough to not get pregnant.
Imagine some female that loves to kill babies so she gets pregnant on purpose then before giving birth she kills it intentionally and keeps doing it.
So this woman can grow it in her stomach for 8 months then kill it or let someone else kill it for her and keep doing that?
By what you wrote you're completely fine with that.
I think that's short sighted and nuts.
By your thinking why limit the termination before she gives birth?
Why not allow the mother to kill her child anytime she wants at any age?
She grew it in her stomach. She presumably fed it, raised it, took care of it.
Why not let her or the father kill their own children at will?
Have you ever had a pet that you raised in your own home?
Do you think that gives you the right to kill it anytime you want?
Sick.
--
[Old Memory]
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Darkoil
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Agreed.
An early fetus up to about 20 weeks is not a child.
--
candybee
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
rulerofthenight
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
What if you abort the fetus after 19 weeks, 6 days, 23 hours, 59 minutes, and 59.999 seconds? Is it still ok to kill the baby then?
--
Darkoil
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Yep.
--
[Old Memory]
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Fatherhood's gonna be a hell of a ride for you huh?
--
Darkoil
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
What is that supposed to mean?
20 weeks. That is 5 months old.
--
Darkoil
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You can count, well done to you.