Abortion: Men's take.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

← View full post
Comments ( 14 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • Darkoil
    9 years ago | pl

    It should be completely and solely up to the woman if she wants an abortion or not however if a man wants nothing to do with the child once it is born then that should also be acceptable.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    Report
    2
    2
      -
    • Sheppard
      9 years ago | pl

      Then she and the government shouldn't have any financial claims on the male either and we all know how that story goes.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      Report
      4
      4
        -
      • rulerofthenight
        9 years ago | pl

        I agree with you. my whole issue with this is that if the women decide to abort the baby the man has no say in it( legally anyways). but if she does keep it then.. he has to pay child support. Seems men are getting the short end of the stick as far as children are concerned.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
        Report
        1
        1
          -
        • Sheppard
          9 years ago | pl

          You are correct.

          Men do get the short end of the stick in many ways in society, especially when a woman is involved.

          I'll probably never get married because of the unfairness from the court systems in the event of a divorce.

          It's insanity. A female can lie, cheat, do anything and the guy ends up paying her money every month while she's fucking other guys. If there's a kid, she gets the kid and he pays for it. The stupid guy has to pay alimony until she re-marries which of course she won't do until she's got some other sucker on the line who makes more money.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
          Report
          -1
          -1
    • Couman
      9 years ago | pl

      Exactly. The baby grows in the woman's body, so it's totally right and proper that she should have the final say about whether to keep it. But the long term consequences for potential father are also quite profound, so he too should have the option cancel his impending parenthood, albeit only as a legal fiction.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      Report
      4
      4
    • Sheppard
      9 years ago | pl

      I disagree.

      We're talking about someone's life here and in the moment a defenseless unborn child.

      In almost no other case can another person claim termination on someone else.

      Only in rare cases where there's something tragically wrong with the other person or that person was deemed extremely harmful and unfit for society does termination of another acceptably happen.

      So what if person grows inside a woman? That doesn't mean much.
      Shouldn't give her the right to kill it at will.

      If she didn't want it she should of been smart enough to not get pregnant.

      Imagine some female that loves to kill babies so she gets pregnant on purpose then before giving birth she kills it intentionally and keeps doing it.

      So this woman can grow it in her stomach for 8 months then kill it or let someone else kill it for her and keep doing that?

      By what you wrote you're completely fine with that.

      I think that's short sighted and nuts.

      By your thinking why limit the termination before she gives birth?
      Why not allow the mother to kill her child anytime she wants at any age?
      She grew it in her stomach. She presumably fed it, raised it, took care of it.

      Why not let her or the father kill their own children at will?

      Have you ever had a pet that you raised in your own home?
      Do you think that gives you the right to kill it anytime you want?

      Sick.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      Report
      0
      0