I thought you were done with this? No? Then this shall continue. Where did I prove you wrong? Ahem. Let me clear my typing throat, saying this so many times just to have you ignore it is taking a toll on my little typing fingers (not really, I could counter your points all day with ease). "The points in which you couldn't counter even one, the comments that listed 1 to 17 the points you didn't/couldn't counter, then when I present them to you, to prove that you can't counter them, you can't even attempt to answer them. That's how I proved you wrong, by making seventeen points, which where only half of the amount I could of typed out, and you could not answering them. You were able to reply every single other side point that has next to no point in the debate that was sent at the same time as the main comment that "you" said you wanted, then when I type them all out, you can't even answer them. Hiding behind the "They're retarded" excuse, the pathetic excuse for someone that's trying to act smart by saying they can win a debate, yet can't answer the main questions presented.
It's pathetic. I have had to mention the comment that was the main one in this whole debate that "you" asked for, then ignore. Your excuse for not answering the points that counter your points? "Your comments are too retarded to answer"...-Facepalm-
So, oh wait, I did.
Don't think I didn't? Prove me wrong, answer those points 1 to 17. Or are you going to make some moronic excuse not to attempt to counter them? Because according to you, my whole point on this is "retarded", so you can't fall on the excuse "your comments are retarded, which is why I won't answer them" when you replied to all my other comments in which you deemed retarded.
-Sigh-
It was actually pretty funny watching you act like a child, saying I haven't proven you wrong, yet you do everything you can't do anything to prove the points I made to you wrong, but now it's just sad...Well, funny and sad. Funny in the fact that you are using the most childish, moronic excuses to not answer the main points of the discussion that were labled 1 to 17 that were the whole point of the discussion, all while "trying" to seem like you have a reasonable argument, and sad in the fact that you actually have resorted to that, thinking that it's at all a good point.
"I won't answer the main points of the debate that countered my points because they're retarded, regardless of me always replying to all the other replies the other debater made, also deeming them retarded but still willing to reply to them".
Oh, what a sad person you are, very patheticly sad. Get back to the school yard with your stupid thought process that "I won't answer because they're retarded" is at all a good counter point. -Facepalm-
Abortion: Against or For?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I thought you were done with this? No? Then this shall continue. Where did I prove you wrong? Ahem. Let me clear my typing throat, saying this so many times just to have you ignore it is taking a toll on my little typing fingers (not really, I could counter your points all day with ease). "The points in which you couldn't counter even one, the comments that listed 1 to 17 the points you didn't/couldn't counter, then when I present them to you, to prove that you can't counter them, you can't even attempt to answer them. That's how I proved you wrong, by making seventeen points, which where only half of the amount I could of typed out, and you could not answering them. You were able to reply every single other side point that has next to no point in the debate that was sent at the same time as the main comment that "you" said you wanted, then when I type them all out, you can't even answer them. Hiding behind the "They're retarded" excuse, the pathetic excuse for someone that's trying to act smart by saying they can win a debate, yet can't answer the main questions presented.
It's pathetic. I have had to mention the comment that was the main one in this whole debate that "you" asked for, then ignore. Your excuse for not answering the points that counter your points? "Your comments are too retarded to answer"...-Facepalm-
So, oh wait, I did.
Don't think I didn't? Prove me wrong, answer those points 1 to 17. Or are you going to make some moronic excuse not to attempt to counter them? Because according to you, my whole point on this is "retarded", so you can't fall on the excuse "your comments are retarded, which is why I won't answer them" when you replied to all my other comments in which you deemed retarded.
-Sigh-
It was actually pretty funny watching you act like a child, saying I haven't proven you wrong, yet you do everything you can't do anything to prove the points I made to you wrong, but now it's just sad...Well, funny and sad. Funny in the fact that you are using the most childish, moronic excuses to not answer the main points of the discussion that were labled 1 to 17 that were the whole point of the discussion, all while "trying" to seem like you have a reasonable argument, and sad in the fact that you actually have resorted to that, thinking that it's at all a good point.
"I won't answer the main points of the debate that countered my points because they're retarded, regardless of me always replying to all the other replies the other debater made, also deeming them retarded but still willing to reply to them".
Oh, what a sad person you are, very patheticly sad. Get back to the school yard with your stupid thought process that "I won't answer because they're retarded" is at all a good counter point. -Facepalm-