OK, you win....whatever....when you take this to the legislature, and they are just beaming over your brilliant idea, then give me a holler. I'll be waiting.
I'm not even going to bother with you anymore, you ask a question, people try to show you flaws in your plan and you refuse to even listen. How do you expect to learn ANYTHING if you NEVER listen.
Plus, you're just a kid, you have NO clue how the world works. Give it time.
The fact that you REFUSE to talk to a lawyer proves all points....you know damn well they'd have a good, hearty laugh at your expense because your idea is plain absurd. Scaredy cat. If you have so much confidence in your plan, and think you're SOOOOOO right, then why not talk to lawmakers?
I don't counter all your points because for one thing, they're not points, they're half-baked notions. No need to point out how retarded they are.
Funny how you kiss ass to the 3 idiots who agree with you, yet anyone who goes against you, you tear into instead of listening to their concerns. Don't you know, people who want to innovate or change things NEED opinions of all sorts in order to fine tune their agenda. You lack that skill, therefore you will never get anywhere. Do you think many successful and powerful people got that way by being a close-minded prick? No, they didn't.
So, with that, I'll see ya around, but as for this discussion, I'm out. Learn to read and be more tolerant instead of flying into a rage every time someone disagrees with you. It's black and white with you, if someone agrees, you LOVE them. Disagree, and they've become your worst enemy. That's not how to get tings done. Talk to professionals, find out how successful people 'made it'. That should help you. Of course, maybe not because they'd probably criticize your attitude and mannerisms. You'll never get anywhere in life acting like this.
-Sigh- How am I expected to listen to someone that is refusing to show the "flaws" of the main points I make? Like I said, if you call it a flaw, prove it, don't say it is then avoid proving it, mostly because you can't.
So yeah, I guess it is my fault to not listen to the flaws that you never show... -sigh-
I'm just a kid...Yet you have the hardest time proving this kids idea to be stupid, and fail to do it. Also, I'm not a "kid", I'm a young adult. Granted, I'm not in the adult world yet, but that doesn't make me a kid. Besides, what you reffer to as "Kids" could have more info on this subject than an adult, it just depends on who spends the most time on the subject.
The fact that I refuse to call a layer, ask them to have a two hour plus debate with me, not paying them, expecting them to waste more than two hours of their career time that they could be spending time earning money from, or personal time in which I doubt they'd want to talk to someone asking for a two hour plus debate on something that he/she most likely cares nothing about. So no, the fact that I won't call a lawyer, expecting them to do the above, for no financial gain proves that I have something you don't...Common sense. Like I said, you made my statement in to a debate, you brought the suggestion up, and I'll be happy to talk to them. It's not the talking to them that I feel I will make a fool of myself doing, it's the expecting them to spend so much time out of their day for no gain that will definetly make me look like a fool. The fact that you aren't willing to do so is also an indicator that you yourself know that it's a stupid, illogical thing to do. But hey, better idea. How about "You" phone these people up, and explain the debate on your half? Eh? How about you phone up to prove me wrong? Oh, that's right, because you know it's a stupid idea. -Facepalm-
-Facepalm- Really, you will give me a concussion with the amount of times you're making me facepalm.
You have claimed most of my points "Stupid" yet you were happy to "try" counter them? Then when you say "I'll gladly reply to the points, go ahead and make the list" you completely avoid the questions. Oh, ofcourse, it's my points that are retarded. So no, don't try to say the most patheicly obvious failing argument tactic: "Your points are too retarded to answer". I mean, seriously. Have some self respect atleast. You remind me of those kids that say "I can do that if I wanted to, I just don't want to".
If my points are so retarded, then they'd be easily countered, right? And since you are more tham happy to make six paragraphs attempting to insult, then you should have the time to go through these "reatarded points" and counter them with ease, right?
You're a joke. Fact is, you asked, I delivered, and you didn't like the package. It's not that you won't counter them, it's that you can't counter them, and the fact that you think people are too stupid to notice it is just astounding and pathetic.
I kiss ass? It's called being polite to the people being polite to you, but I like how you "try" to turn that in to someone "kissing ass". I tear in to them? Well, that's because I have heard their points before and countered them before, too.
"The three idiots"? Ah, that's right, after just claiming one has to hear another's opinions to make an accurate change, you call three people that have different opinions as you as "idiots". Practice what you preach. You contradict yourself flopping around for new points, if you can call them that.
Oh, and by the way, it's more than three people, more so about six or seven people that agree with me. I shared this whole thing with the chat, and let me tell you, things such as logical, thoughtful, sense, understanding where "not" the words being described about you. But let me guess, you'll say those people are idiots, too? What's sad is that you most likely would.
A "close-minded prick". It's not "close-minded" when the person is correct in which they're debating. Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't take the points that can easily be countered as valuable parts needed for a change...Silly me for thinking useless points aren't a benefit to have. Remember, lawyers are all about being close-minded, fighting for their client, so people do get far like that. -Facepalm-
I like how you say "as for this discussion, I'm out"...Wigsplitz, you were out of this discussion long ago, believe me. Flying in to rage? I'm sitting here with a smile on my face, of how easily dealt you are. I have dissagreed and debated with people that agree with me on this subject, and I have agreed completely with people on other topic that don't agree with me on others. So that whole love them, hate them part is very innacurate.
Yes, because I'm going to take life lessons from you of all people...That's laughable.
Abortion: Against or For?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
OK, you win....whatever....when you take this to the legislature, and they are just beaming over your brilliant idea, then give me a holler. I'll be waiting.
I'm not even going to bother with you anymore, you ask a question, people try to show you flaws in your plan and you refuse to even listen. How do you expect to learn ANYTHING if you NEVER listen.
Plus, you're just a kid, you have NO clue how the world works. Give it time.
The fact that you REFUSE to talk to a lawyer proves all points....you know damn well they'd have a good, hearty laugh at your expense because your idea is plain absurd. Scaredy cat. If you have so much confidence in your plan, and think you're SOOOOOO right, then why not talk to lawmakers?
I don't counter all your points because for one thing, they're not points, they're half-baked notions. No need to point out how retarded they are.
Funny how you kiss ass to the 3 idiots who agree with you, yet anyone who goes against you, you tear into instead of listening to their concerns. Don't you know, people who want to innovate or change things NEED opinions of all sorts in order to fine tune their agenda. You lack that skill, therefore you will never get anywhere. Do you think many successful and powerful people got that way by being a close-minded prick? No, they didn't.
So, with that, I'll see ya around, but as for this discussion, I'm out. Learn to read and be more tolerant instead of flying into a rage every time someone disagrees with you. It's black and white with you, if someone agrees, you LOVE them. Disagree, and they've become your worst enemy. That's not how to get tings done. Talk to professionals, find out how successful people 'made it'. That should help you. Of course, maybe not because they'd probably criticize your attitude and mannerisms. You'll never get anywhere in life acting like this.
See ya.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-Sigh- How am I expected to listen to someone that is refusing to show the "flaws" of the main points I make? Like I said, if you call it a flaw, prove it, don't say it is then avoid proving it, mostly because you can't.
So yeah, I guess it is my fault to not listen to the flaws that you never show... -sigh-
I'm just a kid...Yet you have the hardest time proving this kids idea to be stupid, and fail to do it. Also, I'm not a "kid", I'm a young adult. Granted, I'm not in the adult world yet, but that doesn't make me a kid. Besides, what you reffer to as "Kids" could have more info on this subject than an adult, it just depends on who spends the most time on the subject.
The fact that I refuse to call a layer, ask them to have a two hour plus debate with me, not paying them, expecting them to waste more than two hours of their career time that they could be spending time earning money from, or personal time in which I doubt they'd want to talk to someone asking for a two hour plus debate on something that he/she most likely cares nothing about. So no, the fact that I won't call a lawyer, expecting them to do the above, for no financial gain proves that I have something you don't...Common sense. Like I said, you made my statement in to a debate, you brought the suggestion up, and I'll be happy to talk to them. It's not the talking to them that I feel I will make a fool of myself doing, it's the expecting them to spend so much time out of their day for no gain that will definetly make me look like a fool. The fact that you aren't willing to do so is also an indicator that you yourself know that it's a stupid, illogical thing to do. But hey, better idea. How about "You" phone these people up, and explain the debate on your half? Eh? How about you phone up to prove me wrong? Oh, that's right, because you know it's a stupid idea. -Facepalm-
-Facepalm- Really, you will give me a concussion with the amount of times you're making me facepalm.
You have claimed most of my points "Stupid" yet you were happy to "try" counter them? Then when you say "I'll gladly reply to the points, go ahead and make the list" you completely avoid the questions. Oh, ofcourse, it's my points that are retarded. So no, don't try to say the most patheicly obvious failing argument tactic: "Your points are too retarded to answer". I mean, seriously. Have some self respect atleast. You remind me of those kids that say "I can do that if I wanted to, I just don't want to".
If my points are so retarded, then they'd be easily countered, right? And since you are more tham happy to make six paragraphs attempting to insult, then you should have the time to go through these "reatarded points" and counter them with ease, right?
You're a joke. Fact is, you asked, I delivered, and you didn't like the package. It's not that you won't counter them, it's that you can't counter them, and the fact that you think people are too stupid to notice it is just astounding and pathetic.
I kiss ass? It's called being polite to the people being polite to you, but I like how you "try" to turn that in to someone "kissing ass". I tear in to them? Well, that's because I have heard their points before and countered them before, too.
"The three idiots"? Ah, that's right, after just claiming one has to hear another's opinions to make an accurate change, you call three people that have different opinions as you as "idiots". Practice what you preach. You contradict yourself flopping around for new points, if you can call them that.
Oh, and by the way, it's more than three people, more so about six or seven people that agree with me. I shared this whole thing with the chat, and let me tell you, things such as logical, thoughtful, sense, understanding where "not" the words being described about you. But let me guess, you'll say those people are idiots, too? What's sad is that you most likely would.
A "close-minded prick". It's not "close-minded" when the person is correct in which they're debating. Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't take the points that can easily be countered as valuable parts needed for a change...Silly me for thinking useless points aren't a benefit to have. Remember, lawyers are all about being close-minded, fighting for their client, so people do get far like that. -Facepalm-
I like how you say "as for this discussion, I'm out"...Wigsplitz, you were out of this discussion long ago, believe me. Flying in to rage? I'm sitting here with a smile on my face, of how easily dealt you are. I have dissagreed and debated with people that agree with me on this subject, and I have agreed completely with people on other topic that don't agree with me on others. So that whole love them, hate them part is very innacurate.
Yes, because I'm going to take life lessons from you of all people...That's laughable.
Goodbye, it has been entertaining.