Ah yes, you mean like my mother? Someone that has worked with people that would be involved in situations this debate is about? She fully agrees that financial abortion should be allowed. How about people such as the Youtuber "TheAmazingAtheist"? How about the Youtuber "Girlwrites what", a mother of three children, just like my mother?
Only people that will agree with me are morons? I've just proven every popint you have wrong, then when I show you more points that you can't counter, specificly to show you that you can't counter them, you avoid answering them at all. You can't call someone a moron if you can't even counter their points.
Like I said, you set it up, and I'll talk to them. Yes, sit in court, then what? All I can do is sit and listen. If I was to say something that is an accurate counter point, I would be flung out, not because of the point being presented, but because of me speaking in a case that has nothing to do with me. So repeat the bit that comes after that bit, you know, the bit about learning something.
How idiotic, how idiotic, how idiotic, you moron, you moron, idiot, idiot, etc, etc, yada, yada.
Those fricken statements only work and can be taken seriously if you are winning the debate. As I explained, I have already won this debate due to you refusing to answer the main point I presented, presented just to prove you couldn't answer them, in which case you couldn'teven attempt to.
Calling someone who's winning a debate while you lose a debate am idiot, or say their claim is idiotic, even when you're losing the whole debate of whether or not it's idiotic, is just plain stupid. You're an idiot. And see how I am able to do that and it actually can be considered an accurate statement? That's because I won this debate.
The sad thing is, you know you lost this debate, and I know you know it. You just can't admit defeat, even when you have been beaten to the ground in this debate. It's just plain sad. The more you try to make a point, the easier it gets for me, because with each point of yours I counter, you flip flop to an even easier point to counter, or just repeat a point I have already countered.
I introduced this to the nice users of the chat room. Even they are sitting there like "What the fuck?" at your selfproclaimed counter points.
Keep them coming, Wigsplitz. I can counter any point you throw at me, where as all you can do is hide from mine.
But I guess I should apologize, I gave you the false impression that you could win a debate with me due to not making as much effort in my earlier debates with you. You obviously noticed the difference between our debates from now and from last time we debated. Want to know the reason why the sudden change? On how the taxpayers argument was different in our last debate than it is now? Simple, the taxpayers arguement wasn't that changed, I did. When we last had our discussion, I wasn't motivated to put much effort in to proving myself right, but now I am back to the way I used to be, motivated to prove my point right, and even more motivated to smash arrogant, pathetic, sarcastic peoples's egos such as yourself, down to the ground in debates.
There is one thing you can learn from this, Wigsplitz, and that is to not engage in a debate with me again in hopes of proving what little point you think you have, unless you want want a long debate that will result in me winning half way through it, then for the rest of the debate, you trying to hold the broken pieced of your fragile ego to the point of making yourself look like an idiot.
Abortion: Against or For?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Ah yes, you mean like my mother? Someone that has worked with people that would be involved in situations this debate is about? She fully agrees that financial abortion should be allowed. How about people such as the Youtuber "TheAmazingAtheist"? How about the Youtuber "Girlwrites what", a mother of three children, just like my mother?
Only people that will agree with me are morons? I've just proven every popint you have wrong, then when I show you more points that you can't counter, specificly to show you that you can't counter them, you avoid answering them at all. You can't call someone a moron if you can't even counter their points.
Like I said, you set it up, and I'll talk to them. Yes, sit in court, then what? All I can do is sit and listen. If I was to say something that is an accurate counter point, I would be flung out, not because of the point being presented, but because of me speaking in a case that has nothing to do with me. So repeat the bit that comes after that bit, you know, the bit about learning something.
How idiotic, how idiotic, how idiotic, you moron, you moron, idiot, idiot, etc, etc, yada, yada.
Those fricken statements only work and can be taken seriously if you are winning the debate. As I explained, I have already won this debate due to you refusing to answer the main point I presented, presented just to prove you couldn't answer them, in which case you couldn'teven attempt to.
Calling someone who's winning a debate while you lose a debate am idiot, or say their claim is idiotic, even when you're losing the whole debate of whether or not it's idiotic, is just plain stupid. You're an idiot. And see how I am able to do that and it actually can be considered an accurate statement? That's because I won this debate.
The sad thing is, you know you lost this debate, and I know you know it. You just can't admit defeat, even when you have been beaten to the ground in this debate. It's just plain sad. The more you try to make a point, the easier it gets for me, because with each point of yours I counter, you flip flop to an even easier point to counter, or just repeat a point I have already countered.
I introduced this to the nice users of the chat room. Even they are sitting there like "What the fuck?" at your selfproclaimed counter points.
Keep them coming, Wigsplitz. I can counter any point you throw at me, where as all you can do is hide from mine.
But I guess I should apologize, I gave you the false impression that you could win a debate with me due to not making as much effort in my earlier debates with you. You obviously noticed the difference between our debates from now and from last time we debated. Want to know the reason why the sudden change? On how the taxpayers argument was different in our last debate than it is now? Simple, the taxpayers arguement wasn't that changed, I did. When we last had our discussion, I wasn't motivated to put much effort in to proving myself right, but now I am back to the way I used to be, motivated to prove my point right, and even more motivated to smash arrogant, pathetic, sarcastic peoples's egos such as yourself, down to the ground in debates.
There is one thing you can learn from this, Wigsplitz, and that is to not engage in a debate with me again in hopes of proving what little point you think you have, unless you want want a long debate that will result in me winning half way through it, then for the rest of the debate, you trying to hold the broken pieced of your fragile ego to the point of making yourself look like an idiot.
You lose.